Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
E32808
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of race-conscious admissions policies at public universities under the Equal Protection Clause.
Observed surface forms (4)
Statements (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
affirmative action case ⓘ equal protection case ⓘ |
| arguedDate | October 10, 2012 ⓘ |
| citation |
133 S. Ct. 2411
ⓘ
186 L. Ed. 2d 474 ⓘ 570 U.S. 297 ⓘ |
| concurrenceBy |
Antonin Scalia
ⓘ
Clarence Thomas ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvision |
Equal Protection Clause
ⓘ
surface form:
Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
|
| country |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decidedDate | June 24, 2013 ⓘ |
| disposition | Judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated and case remanded. ⓘ |
| dissentBy | Ruth Bader Ginsburg ⓘ |
| docketNumber | 11-345 ⓘ |
| fullName | Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin self-link ⓘ |
| holding |
Courts must verify that a university’s use of race in admissions is narrowly tailored to obtain the educational benefits of diversity.
ⓘ
The Fifth Circuit did not apply the correct standard of strict scrutiny to the University of Texas at Austin’s use of race in undergraduate admissions. ⓘ |
| impact | clarified the application of strict scrutiny to race-conscious admissions policies at public universities. ⓘ |
| joinedByInMajority |
Antonin Scalia
ⓘ
Clarence Thomas ⓘ Elena Kagan recused ⓘ John G. Roberts Jr. ⓘ Samuel A. Alito Jr. ⓘ Sonia Sotomayor ⓘ Stephen G. Breyer ⓘ |
| jurisdiction |
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
ⓘ
surface form:
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (on appeal)
|
| legalIssue |
constitutionality of race-conscious undergraduate admissions policies at public universities
ⓘ
standard of judicial review for race-based affirmative action in higher education ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy | Anthony M. Kennedy ⓘ |
| originatingCourt | United States District Court for the Western District of Texas ⓘ |
| petitioner | Abigail Noel Fisher ⓘ |
| relatedCase |
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
self-linksurface differs
ⓘ
surface form:
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2016)
Gratz v. Bollinger ⓘ Grutter v. Bollinger ⓘ Regents of the University of California v. Bakke ⓘ |
| respondent |
University of Texas at Austin
ⓘ
surface form:
UT Austin Office of Admissions
University of Texas at Austin ⓘ |
| shortName |
Fisher I
ⓘ
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin self-linksurface differs ⓘ
surface form:
Fisher v. Texas
|
| standardOfReview | strict scrutiny ⓘ |
| subjectMatter |
civil rights
ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ public university admissions ⓘ |
| subsequentHistory |
On remand, the Fifth Circuit again upheld the University of Texas at Austin’s admissions policy.
ⓘ
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin self-linksurface differs ⓘ
surface form:
The Supreme Court later affirmed the University of Texas at Austin’s policy in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2016).
|
| topic |
affirmative action in higher education
ⓘ
race-conscious admissions policies ⓘ |
Referenced by (9)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
→
fullName
→
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
self-link
ⓘ
this entity surface form:
influenced later affirmative action cases such as Fisher v. University of Texas
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund represented plaintiffs
→
notableCase
→
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
ⓘ
subject surface form:
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
→
relatedCase
→
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
self-linksurface differs
ⓘ
this entity surface form:
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2016)
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
→
shortName
→
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
self-linksurface differs
ⓘ
this entity surface form:
Fisher v. Texas
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
→
subsequentCaseInfluenced
→
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
ⓘ
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
→
subsequentHistory
→
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
self-linksurface differs
ⓘ
this entity surface form:
The Supreme Court later affirmed the University of Texas at Austin’s policy in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2016).