Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
E15486
United States Supreme Court case
constitutional law case
equal protection case
landmark affirmative action case
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down rigid racial quotas in university admissions while upholding the constitutionality of using race as one factor among many to foster diversity.
Aliases (2)
Statements (55)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
→
constitutional law case → equal protection case → landmark affirmative action case → |
| areaOfLaw |
civil rights law
→
education law → |
| arguedDate |
1977-10-12
→
|
| citation |
438 U.S. 265
→
|
| concurrenceBy |
Byron R. White
→
Harry A. Blackmun → Lewis F. Powell Jr. → Thurgood Marshall → William J. Brennan Jr. → |
| constitutionalProvisionInterpreted |
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
→
|
| court |
Supreme Court of the United States
→
|
| decisionDate |
1978-06-28
→
|
| dissentBy |
John Paul Stevens
→
Potter Stewart → Warren E. Burger → William H. Rehnquist → |
| fullName |
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
→
|
| holding |
Allan Bakke must be admitted to the University of California, Davis School of Medicine
→
Race may be considered as one factor among many in university admissions → Rigid racial quotas in admissions violate the Equal Protection Clause → The specific special admissions program at UC Davis School of Medicine was unconstitutional → |
| impact |
established diversity in higher education as a compelling interest
→
limited the use of rigid racial quotas in admissions → |
| issue |
constitutionality of racial quotas in university admissions
→
use of race as a factor in admissions decisions → |
| jurisdiction |
United States federal law
→
|
| legalRule |
Achieving a diverse student body can be a compelling governmental interest
→
Race-conscious admissions policies must be narrowly tailored → Racial classifications in admissions are subject to strict scrutiny → |
| locationOfLowerCourt |
California
→
|
| majorityOpinionBy |
Lewis F. Powell Jr.
→
|
| opinionType |
plurality opinion
→
|
| originatingCourt |
Supreme Court of California
→
|
| pageInUnitedStatesReports |
265
→
|
| partyRoleOfAllanBakke |
white male applicant to medical school
→
|
| petitioner |
Regents of the University of California
→
|
| programChallenged |
special admissions program for minority applicants at UC Davis School of Medicine
→
|
| quotaDescription |
16 of 100 seats reserved for minority applicants
→
|
| rearguedDate |
1978-03-14
→
|
| relatedInstitution |
University of California, Davis School of Medicine
→
|
| respondent |
Allan Bakke
→
|
| shortName |
Bakke
→
|
| statuteInterpreted |
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
→
|
| subjectMatter |
Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
→
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 → affirmative action in higher education admissions → |
| subsequentCaseInfluenced |
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
→
Gratz v. Bollinger → Grutter v. Bollinger → |
| volumeOfUnitedStatesReports |
438
→
|
| yearDecided |
1978
→
|
Referenced by (13)
| Subject (surface form when different) | Predicate |
|---|---|
|
Equal Protection Clause
→
|
basisFor |
|
Grutter v. Bollinger
→
|
followedPrecedent |
|
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
→
|
fullName |
|
Bakke
→
|
hasFullName |
|
United States Supreme Court cases of the Burger Court
→
|
hasNotableCase |
|
Bakke
("influenced later affirmative action cases such as Gratz v. Bollinger")
→
|
impact |
|
Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
→
|
keyCase |
|
Allan Bakke
→
|
notableFor |
|
Lewis F. Powell Jr.
("majority opinion in Regents of the University of California v. Bakke")
→
|
notableWork |
|
Allan Bakke
→
|
partyTo |
|
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
→
|
relatedCase |
|
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
→
|
relatedCaseLaw |
|
Bakke
→
|
shortFor |