holding
P2237
predicate
Indicates that one entity is physically grasping, carrying, or keeping another entity in its possession or control.
Observed surface forms (1)
- keeps ×3
Sample triples (401)
| Subject | Object |
|---|---|
| 11-400 | Medicaid expansion provision unconstitutionally coercive in part → |
| 11-400 | individual mandate not sustainable under the Commerce Clause → |
| 11-400 | individual mandate upheld as a valid exercise of Congress’s taxing power → |
| Abrams v. United States | held that the leaflets posed a sufficient danger to be punished under the Espionage Act as amended → |
| Abrams v. United States | upheld convictions of defendants for distributing leaflets criticizing U.S. involvement in World War I → |
| American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi |
American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi
self-linksurface differs
→
surface form:
California Holocaust Victim Insurance Relief Act was preempted by the federal foreign affairs power
|
| American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi | State law that interferes with the federal government’s conduct of foreign relations is preempted → |
| Argersinger v. Hamlin | No person may be imprisoned for any offense unless represented by counsel or unless there was a knowing and intelligent waiver of counsel. → |
| Argersinger v. Hamlin | The Sixth Amendment right to counsel applies to misdemeanor and petty offense prosecutions that result in actual imprisonment. → |
| Arizona v. United States | Federal law preempts several provisions of Arizona S.B. 1070 regulating immigration enforcement. → |
| Arizona v. United States | Section 2(B) of S.B. 1070, requiring officers to make a reasonable attempt to determine immigration status during lawful stops, is not facially preempted. → |
| Arizona v. United States | Section 3 of S.B. 1070, creating a state crime for failure to carry federal registration documents, is preempted. → |
| Arizona v. United States | Section 5(C) of S.B. 1070, criminalizing unauthorized aliens seeking or engaging in work, is preempted. → |
| Arizona v. United States | Section 6 of S.B. 1070, authorizing warrantless arrests based on possible removability, is preempted. → |
| Arizona v. United States | States may not enact or enforce immigration policies that conflict with federal immigration law. → |
| Baker v. Nelson | same-sex marriage claims did not present a substantial federal question under the U.S. Constitution → |
| Bakke |
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
→
surface form:
Title VI of the Civil Rights Act is coextensive with the Equal Protection Clause in this context
|
| Bakke | race may be considered as one factor among others in admissions → |
| Bakke | strict racial quotas in admissions are unconstitutional → |
| Baldwin v. Fish and Game Commission of Montana | Montana may charge higher elk-hunting license fees to nonresidents than to residents → |
| Baldwin v. Fish and Game Commission of Montana | differential elk-hunting license fees for nonresidents do not violate the Privileges and Immunities Clause → |
| Baldwin v. Fish and Game Commission of Montana | recreational hunting is not a fundamental right protected by the Privileges and Immunities Clause → |
| Baldwin v. Fish and Game Commission of Montana | the Privileges and Immunities Clause does not apply to purely recreational activities → |
| Barnard v. Thorstenn | residency requirements for bar admission violated the Privileges and Immunities Clause → |
| Betts v. Brady | Appointment of counsel in state criminal cases is required only under special circumstances → |
| Betts v. Brady | Indigent defendants in state felony cases are not automatically entitled to court-appointed counsel → |
|
Bolling v. Sharpe (argued separately, decided same day)
surface form:
Bolling v. Sharpe
|
Racial segregation in District of Columbia public schools violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment → |
| Bolling v. Sharpe | racial segregation in District of Columbia public schools is unconstitutional → |
| Bond v. United States | A criminal defendant has standing to challenge a federal statute on the ground that it violates the Tenth Amendment → |
| Bond v. United States | Federalism protects the liberty of individuals as well as the prerogatives of states → |
| Bond v. United States | Individuals, not just states, may raise Tenth Amendment arguments against federal statutes → |
| Bostock v. Clayton County |
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
→
surface form:
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employers from firing individuals for being homosexual
|
| Bostock v. Clayton County | Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits employers from firing individuals for being transgender → |
| Bourke v. Beshear | Kentucky must recognize valid same-sex marriages performed in other states → |
| Bourke v. Beshear | Kentucky’s refusal to recognize out-of-state same-sex marriages violates the Fourteenth Amendment → |
| Boynton v. Virginia | Interstate bus terminals and their restaurants serving interstate passengers are subject to federal nondiscrimination rules → |
| Boynton v. Virginia | Racial segregation in facilities serving interstate bus passengers violates the Interstate Commerce Act → |
| Brandenburg v. Ohio | Government may punish advocacy of illegal action only where it is directed to inciting or producing imminent lawless action and is likely to incite or produce such action. → |
| Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee | Arizona’s ballot collection law is not enacted with discriminatory intent in violation of the Fifteenth Amendment → |
| Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee | Arizona’s out-of-precinct policy does not violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act → |
| Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee | Arizona’s restrictions on third-party ballot collection do not violate Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act → |
| Browder v. Gayle | racial segregation on Montgomery city buses is unconstitutional → |
| Browder v. Gayle | segregation on public buses violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment → |
| Brown II | Desegregation of public schools was to proceed with "all deliberate speed." → |
| Brown II | Federal district courts were to supervise the desegregation of public schools. → |
| Brown v. Board of Education | racial segregation in public schools is unconstitutional → |
| Brown v. Board of Education | separate educational facilities are inherently unequal → |
| Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. | Closely held for-profit corporations can be "persons" under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act → |
| Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. | The HHS contraceptive mandate substantially burdened the exercise of religion of the companies’ owners → |
| Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. | The government failed to show that the contraceptive mandate was the least restrictive means of furthering a compelling governmental interest under RFRA → |