Argersinger v. Hamlin

E58186

Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (2)

Statements (44)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
criminal procedure case
right to counsel case
appliesTo indigent defendants
misdemeanor cases
petty offense cases
areaOfLaw constitutional law
criminal law
criminal procedure
citation 407 U.S. 25
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Fourteenth Amendment
U.S. Constitution, Sixth Amendment
surface form: Sixth Amendment
constitutionalRightExpanded right to appointed counsel beyond felony cases
country United States of America
surface form: United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1972-06-12
docketNumber 70-5015
effect required states to provide counsel before imposing a jail sentence for any offense
extendedFrom Gideon v. Wainwright
fullCaseName Argersinger v. Hamlin self-linksurface differs
surface form: Jon Richard Argersinger v. Raymond Hamlin, Sheriff
holding No person may be imprisoned for any offense unless represented by counsel or unless there was a knowing and intelligent waiver of counsel.
The Sixth Amendment right to counsel applies to misdemeanor and petty offense prosecutions that result in actual imprisonment.
issue Whether an indigent defendant charged with a misdemeanor that may result in imprisonment has a constitutional right to appointed counsel.
jurisdiction Florida
legalPrinciple Due Process Clause
surface form: Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

U.S. Constitution, Sixth Amendment
surface form: Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution

right to counsel
majorityOpinionBy William O. Douglas
surface form: Justice William O. Douglas
overruledOrLimitedBy Scott v. Illinois
page 25
petitioner Jon Richard Argersinger
precedentFor right to counsel in misdemeanor cases involving imprisonment
relatedCase Gideon v. Wainwright
Scott v. Illinois
reporter United States Reports
respondent Hamlin
result conviction reversed
stateCourt Florida Supreme Court
subjectMatter criminal sentencing
indigent defense
unanimousDecision true
volume 407
vote 9-0
yearDecided 1972

Referenced by (6)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Gideon v. Wainwright precedentFor Argersinger v. Hamlin
Argersinger v. Hamlin fullCaseName Argersinger v. Hamlin self-linksurface differs
this entity surface form: Jon Richard Argersinger v. Raymond Hamlin, Sheriff
Alabama v. Shelton hasRelatedCase Argersinger v. Hamlin
Scott v. Illinois limits Argersinger v. Hamlin
Scott v. Illinois relatedCase Argersinger v. Hamlin
Jon Richard Argersinger legalCase Argersinger v. Hamlin