holding

P2237 predicate

Indicates that one entity is physically grasping, carrying, or keeping another entity in its possession or control.

Observed surface forms (1)

  • keeps ×3

Sample triples (401)

Subject Object
Bush v. Gore no constitutionally valid recount could be completed by the relevant deadlines ⓘ
Bush v. Gore the Florida Supreme Court’s method for recounting ballots violated the Equal Protection Clause ⓘ
California v. Texas plaintiffs lacked standing to challenge the minimum essential coverage provision of the ACA ⓘ
California v. Texas NFIB v. Sebelius ⓘ
surface form: the Supreme Court did not reach the merits of the constitutional challenge to the individual mandate
Cantwell v. Connecticut A state may not unduly restrict religious proselytizing through a licensing system that vests discretion in a public official. ⓘ
Cantwell v. Connecticut The Connecticut statute requiring a certificate for religious solicitation violated the First and Fourteenth Amendments. ⓘ
Cantwell v. Connecticut Free Exercise Clause ⓘ
surface form: The Free Exercise Clause of the First Amendment is applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment.
Carter v. Carter Coal Co. Congress may not regulate coal production under the Commerce Clause because production is a local activity, not interstate commerce ⓘ
Carter v. Carter Coal Co. price-fixing and labor provisions of the Bituminous Coal Conservation Act exceeded Congress’s Commerce Clause power ⓘ
Carter v. Carter Coal Co. Bituminous Coal Conservation Act of 1935 ⓘ
surface form: the Bituminous Coal Conservation Act of 1935 was unconstitutional in relevant part
Cheney v. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia The Supreme Court held that courts must consider separation of powers principles before allowing broad discovery into the executive branch’s internal deliberations. ⓘ
Cheney v. U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia The Supreme Court held that the Court of Appeals applied too demanding a standard in denying mandamus relief and failed to properly consider separation of powers concerns in evaluating discovery orders directed at the Vice President and other executive officials. ⓘ
Cherokee Nation v. Georgia The Cherokee Nation is a domestic dependent nation ⓘ
Cherokee Nation v. Georgia The Cherokee Nation is not a foreign state in the sense of the Constitution ⓘ
Cherokee Nation v. Georgia The Supreme Court lacks original jurisdiction over the Cherokee Nation’s suit against Georgia ⓘ
Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah City ordinances targeting Santería animal sacrifice violated the Free Exercise Clause ⓘ
Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah Laws that are not neutral and generally applicable are subject to strict scrutiny under the Free Exercise Clause ⓘ
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act limits on corporate independent expenditures are unconstitutional ⓘ
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission Government may not suppress political speech on the basis of the speaker’s corporate identity ⓘ
Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission Restrictions on independent political expenditures by corporations and unions violate the First Amendment ⓘ
City of Boerne v. Flores Congress exceeded its enforcement powers under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment in applying the Religious Freedom Restoration Act to the states ⓘ
City of Boerne v. Flores The Religious Freedom Restoration Act is unconstitutional as applied to state and local governments ⓘ
Clinton v. Jones A sitting President of the United States has no immunity from civil litigation in federal court for unofficial acts alleged to have occurred before taking office. ⓘ
Clinton v. Jones The Constitution does not require federal courts to stay all private civil lawsuits against the President until he leaves office. ⓘ
Cohens v. Virginia Congress may authorize Supreme Court review of state court decisions in criminal as well as civil cases involving federal questions ⓘ
Cohens v. Virginia State courts are not the final arbiters of federal law when the U.S. Supreme Court has jurisdiction ⓘ
Cohens v. Virginia The U.S. Supreme Court has appellate jurisdiction to review state criminal judgments that involve federal law or the U.S. Constitution ⓘ
Colorado Department of State v. Baca the Tenth Circuit held that Colorado could not remove a presidential elector for casting a vote contrary to the state’s popular vote ⓘ
Cooper v. Aaron State attempts to delay desegregation for public hostility are unconstitutional ⓘ
Cooper v. Aaron State officials may not resist or nullify desegregation orders based on Brown v. Board of Education ⓘ
Cooper v. Aaron States are bound by the Supreme Court’s interpretation of the Constitution ⓘ
Cooper v. Aaron Article VI, Clause 2 of the U.S. Constitution ⓘ
surface form: The Supremacy Clause makes the Constitution and federal court decisions binding on the states
County of Allegheny v. ACLU A Chanukah menorah display outside a government building, when combined with a Christmas tree and a sign saluting liberty, did not violate the Establishment Clause ⓘ
County of Allegheny v. ACLU A crèche display in the Allegheny County Courthouse violated the Establishment Clause ⓘ
Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council Massachusetts law restricting state business with Burma is preempted by federal law ⓘ
Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council federal Burma sanctions statute occupies the field with respect to sanctions against Burma ⓘ
Crosby v. National Foreign Trade Council state Burma law conflicted with federal Burma sanctions regime ⓘ
Cutter v. Wilkinson Government may accommodate religious practices of prisoners without running afoul of the Establishment Clause, so long as it does not elevate accommodation over other significant interests ⓘ
Cutter v. Wilkinson RLUIPA, as applied to institutionalized persons, does not on its face violate the Establishment Clause ⓘ
De Canas v. Bica California state law ⓘ
surface form: California Labor Code § 2805 was not, on its face, preempted by federal immigration law at the time
De Canas v. Bica Not every state enactment which in any way deals with aliens is a regulation of immigration and thus per se preempted by federal power to regulate immigration ⓘ
De Canas v. Bica States possess broad authority under their police powers to regulate the employment relationship to protect workers within the state ⓘ
Debs v. United States Debs v. United States self-linksurface differs ⓘ
surface form: The First Amendment did not protect Debs’s antiwar speech under the circumstances of the case.
Debs v. United States The Supreme Court ruled that Debs’s speech created a permissible basis for criminal liability during wartime. ⓘ
Debs v. United States The Supreme Court upheld Eugene V. Debs’s conviction under the Espionage Act for antiwar speech. ⓘ
Dickerson v. United States 18 U.S.C. § 3501 is unconstitutional to the extent it conflicts with Miranda ⓘ
Dickerson v. United States Miranda v. Arizona announced a constitutional rule that Congress may not supersede by statute ⓘ
Dickerson v. United States statements taken without Miranda warnings are generally inadmissible in the prosecution’s case-in-chief ⓘ
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization The Constitution does not confer a right to abortion. ⓘ
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization The authority to regulate abortion is returned to the people and their elected representatives. ⓘ