Triple

T4089817
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject California v. Texas E87676 entity
Predicate holding P2237 FINISHED
Object the Supreme Court did not reach the merits of the constitutional challenge to the individual mandate E13966 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: the Supreme Court did not reach the merits of the constitutional challenge to the individual mandate | Statement: [California v. Texas, holding, the Supreme Court did not reach the merits of the constitutional challenge to the individual mandate]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: the Supreme Court did not reach the merits of the constitutional challenge to the individual mandate
Context triple: [California v. Texas, holding, the Supreme Court did not reach the merits of the constitutional challenge to the individual mandate]
  • A. King v. Burwell
    King v. Burwell is a landmark 2015 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the availability of federal tax credits for health insurance purchased on exchanges under the Affordable Care Act.
  • B. NFIB v. Sebelius chosen
    NFIB v. Sebelius is the landmark 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that largely upheld the Affordable Care Act, notably ruling that its individual mandate could be sustained under Congress’s taxing power.
  • C. Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.
    Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc. is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that closely held for-profit corporations can claim religious exemptions from certain federal regulations under the Religious Freedom Restoration Act.
  • D. Supreme Court reversed the D.C. Circuit
    Supreme Court reversed the D.C. Circuit is the outcome of the landmark administrative law case Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. NRDC, in which the U.S. Supreme Court limited courts’ ability to impose additional procedural requirements on federal agencies beyond those mandated by statute or the Constitution.
  • E. Windsor v. United States (in part)
    Windsor v. United States (in part) is a landmark 2013 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down key portions of the Defense of Marriage Act, advancing federal recognition of same-sex marriages.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed94425148190be337845d56fac22 completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aefcab0a1c8190a1b0ca48ebc95b31 completed March 9, 2026, 5 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b56b6651d48190915581eca783cf3b completed March 14, 2026, 2:06 p.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:39 p.m.