Cherokee Nation v. Georgia

E39027

Cherokee Nation v. Georgia was an 1831 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court held that the Cherokee Nation was a "domestic dependent nation" lacking standing to sue as a foreign nation, a ruling that shaped federal Indian law and the context of Indian Removal.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (3)

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
federal Indian law case
areaOfLaw constitutional law
federal Indian law
jurisdiction
branchOfGovernmentInvolved judicial branch of the United States
chiefJustice John Marshall
citation 30 U.S. (5 Pet.) 1
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Commerce Clause
surface form: Article I, Section 8, Indian Commerce Clause

Article III of the United States Constitution
context conflict over Georgia laws extending state authority over Cherokee lands
country United States of America
surface form: United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1831
describedAs foundational case in federal Indian law
dissentingJustice Henry Baldwin
effect established the doctrine that tribes are domestic dependent nations
limited the ability of Indian nations to sue states directly in the Supreme Court
fullCaseName Cherokee Nation v. Georgia self-linksurface differs
surface form: The Cherokee Nation v. The State of Georgia
geographicScope Cherokee lands within the State of Georgia
historicalContext policy of Indian Removal under President Andrew Jackson
holding The Cherokee Nation is a domestic dependent nation
The Cherokee Nation is not a foreign state in the sense of the Constitution
The Supreme Court lacks original jurisdiction over the Cherokee Nation’s suit against Georgia
joinedByInMajority Gabriel Duvall
John McLean
Joseph Story
Smith Thompson
jurisdictionDenied original jurisdiction as a suit by a foreign state
languageUsedByCourt “domestic dependent nations” to describe Indian tribes
legalIssue standing of an Indian nation to sue in the Supreme Court as a foreign state
status of Indian tribes under the U.S. Constitution
majorityOpinionBy John Marshall
partyTypeCharacterization domestic dependent nation
ward of the United States
petitioner Cherokee Nation of Oklahoma
surface form: Cherokee Nation
relatedTo Indian Removal
Johnson v. M’Intosh
Marshall Trilogy
Trail of Tears
Worcester v. Georgia
remedySought injunction to prevent enforcement of Georgia laws in Cherokee territory
respondent U.S. state of Georgia
surface form: State of Georgia
result case dismissed for lack of jurisdiction
subsequentInfluence cited in later Supreme Court cases on tribal sovereignty
shaped federal–tribal trust relationship doctrine
timePeriod 19th century
yearArgued 1831

Referenced by (12)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Cherokee Nation (historical) legalCase Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
this entity surface form: Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831)
Worcester v. Georgia precededBy Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
Cherokee Nation v. Georgia fullCaseName Cherokee Nation v. Georgia self-linksurface differs
this entity surface form: The Cherokee Nation v. The State of Georgia
John Marshall Court landmarkCase Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
Native American sovereignty historicallyArticulatedIn Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
this entity surface form: Cherokee Nation v. Georgia (1831)
Cherokee legalCase Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
Johnson v. M’Intosh relatedCase Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
Marshall Trilogy hasPart Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
Cherokee lands within the State of Georgia subjectOf Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
United States federal Indian law and policy shapedBy Cherokee Nation v. Georgia
Marshall Court significantCase Cherokee Nation v. Georgia