holding
P2237
predicate
Indicates that one entity is physically grasping, carrying, or keeping another entity in its possession or control.
Observed surface forms (1)
- keeps ×3
Sample triples (401)
| Subject | Object |
|---|---|
| Engel v. Vitale | government-written prayers in public schools violate the Establishment Clause ⓘ |
| Engel v. Vitale | state-sponsored prayer in public schools is unconstitutional ⓘ |
| Escobedo v. Illinois | A criminal suspect has a Sixth Amendment right to counsel during police interrogation once the investigation focuses on the suspect and the suspect requests an attorney. ⓘ |
| Escobedo v. Illinois | Statements elicited by police during interrogation after a suspect has requested and been denied counsel are inadmissible at trial. ⓘ |
| Eumaeus | Odysseus’ herds of swine via predicate surface "keeps" ⓘ |
| Ex parte Endo | The U.S. government may not detain a concededly loyal American citizen of Japanese ancestry in a relocation center ⓘ |
| Ex parte Endo | The War Relocation Authority lacked authority to subject loyal citizens to continued detention NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| FCC v. Pacifica Foundation | The FCC has authority to sanction a radio station for broadcasting indecent language at a time of day when children are likely to be listening. ⓘ |
| FCC v. Pacifica Foundation | The government may regulate indecent material on public airwaves during times when children are likely to be in the audience. ⓘ |
| Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin | Courts must verify that a university’s use of race in admissions is narrowly tailored to obtain the educational benefits of diversity. ⓘ |
| Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin | The Fifth Circuit did not apply the correct standard of strict scrutiny to the University of Texas at Austin’s use of race in undergraduate admissions. ⓘ |
| Frazee v. Illinois Department of Employment Security | A state may not deny unemployment benefits to a person who refuses Sunday work based on sincere religious beliefs solely because he is not a member of an organized religious denomination ⓘ |
| Frazee v. Illinois Department of Employment Security | Sincere religious beliefs are protected by the Free Exercise Clause even if they are not part of an organized religion ⓘ |
| Frohwerk v. United States | The First Amendment did not bar prosecution of the defendant's antiwar publications under the circumstances of the case. ⓘ |
| Frohwerk v. United States | The Supreme Court held that the federal government could punish speech deemed to obstruct military recruitment during World War I. ⓘ |
| Frohwerk v. United States | The Supreme Court upheld the defendant's conviction for antiwar newspaper articles under the Espionage Act. ⓘ |
| Frontiero v. Richardson | Statutory scheme that treated male and female service members differently for spousal benefits violated equal protection principles embodied in the Fifth Amendment ⓘ |
| Frontiero v. Richardson | The federal government may not require female service members to prove their spouses’ dependency while granting male service members automatic dependency status for their wives ⓘ |
| Fulton v. City of Philadelphia | Philadelphia violated the Free Exercise Clause by refusing to contract with Catholic Social Services unless it agreed to certify same-sex couples as foster parents ⓘ |
| Fulton v. City of Philadelphia | The City’s refusal to contract with Catholic Social Services unless it agreed to certify same-sex couples burdened religious exercise and was not justified under strict scrutiny ⓘ |
| Furman v. Georgia | existing death penalty schemes violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments ⓘ |
| Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority | Congress may apply the Fair Labor Standards Act’s wage and hour provisions to employees of state and local governments under the Commerce Clause ⓘ |
| Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority | the Tenth Amendment does not bar application of the Fair Labor Standards Act to a municipally owned and operated mass transit system ⓘ |
| Gibbons v. Ogden | A New York monopoly on steamboat operation conflicted with federal law and was therefore invalid. ⓘ |
| Gibbons v. Ogden | States may not enact legislation that interferes with or contradicts federal regulation of interstate commerce. ⓘ |
| Gibbons v. Ogden | The power to regulate interstate commerce is granted to Congress by the Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution. ⓘ |
| Gideon v. Wainwright | States are required to provide counsel to indigent defendants charged with serious offenses ⓘ |
| Gideon v. Wainwright | The Sixth Amendment right to counsel in criminal cases is a fundamental right applicable to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ |
| Goldberg v. Kelly | Due process requires a pre-termination hearing when welfare benefits are discontinued ⓘ |
| Goldberg v. Kelly | Public assistance benefits are a form of statutory entitlement protected by due process ⓘ |
| Goldberg v. Kelly | Welfare recipients are entitled to an evidentiary hearing before termination of benefits ⓘ |
| Gonzales v. Raich | Congress may prohibit the local cultivation and use of marijuana under the Commerce Clause even if state law authorizes its use for medical purposes. ⓘ |
| Gratz v. Bollinger | University of Michigan’s undergraduate admissions policy violated the Equal Protection Clause ⓘ |
| Gratz v. Bollinger | automatic distribution of points to underrepresented minorities in admissions is unconstitutional ⓘ |
| Gratz v. Bollinger | the admissions policy was not narrowly tailored to achieve diversity ⓘ |
| Griggs v. Duke Power Co. | Title VII prohibits employment practices that are fair in form but discriminatory in operation ⓘ |
| Griggs v. Duke Power Co. | employers must demonstrate that challenged employment requirements are related to job performance ⓘ |
| Griggs v. Duke Power Co. | employment practices that have a disparate impact on protected groups must be shown to be job related ⓘ |
| Griggs v. Duke Power Co. | good intent or absence of discriminatory intent does not redeem employment procedures that operate as built-in headwinds for minority groups ⓘ |
| Griswold v. Connecticut | A Connecticut statute criminalizing the use of contraceptives by married couples is unconstitutional. ⓘ |
| Griswold v. Connecticut | The Constitution protects a right of marital privacy against state restrictions on contraception use by married couples. ⓘ |
| Grovey v. Townsend | Texas Democratic Party’s whites-only primary rule did not constitute state action and therefore did not violate the Fourteenth or Fifteenth Amendments ⓘ |
| Grutter v. Bollinger | The Equal Protection Clause does not prohibit the narrowly tailored use of race in admissions decisions to further a compelling interest in obtaining the educational benefits that flow from a diverse student body. ⓘ |
| Grutter v. Bollinger | The University of Michigan Law School’s narrowly tailored use of race in admissions decisions is constitutional. ⓘ |
| Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections | State poll taxes in elections violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ |
| Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections | Wealth or payment of a fee cannot be made an electoral standard ⓘ |
|
24th Amendment to the United States Constitution
surface form:
Harper v. Virginia Board of Elections
|
state poll taxes in state elections violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ |
| Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States | Congress may prohibit racial discrimination in public accommodations under the Commerce Clause ⓘ |
| Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States | Places of public accommodation that serve interstate travelers or use goods that have moved in interstate commerce may be regulated by Congress ⓘ |
| Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States | Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a valid exercise of Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause ⓘ |