Triple

T2477935
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Frohwerk v. United States E55132 entity
Predicate holding P2237 FINISHED
Object The First Amendment did not bar prosecution of the defendant's antiwar publications under the circumstances of the case.
The First Amendment did not bar prosecution of the defendant's antiwar publications under the circumstances of the case is the central holding of the 1919 Supreme Court decision Frohwerk v. United States, which upheld convictions for antiwar speech during World War I.
E269893 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (4 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: The First Amendment did not bar prosecution of the defendant's antiwar publications under the circumstances of the case. | Statement: [Frohwerk v. United States, holding, The First Amendment did not bar prosecution of the defendant's antiwar publications under the circumstances of the case.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The First Amendment did not bar prosecution of the defendant's antiwar publications under the circumstances of the case.
Context triple: [Frohwerk v. United States, holding, The First Amendment did not bar prosecution of the defendant's antiwar publications under the circumstances of the case.]
  • A. Schenck v. United States
    Schenck v. United States is a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the “clear and present danger” test, allowing the government to restrict speech during wartime.
  • B. The Right of Free Speech
    The Right of Free Speech is a fundamental civil liberty that protects individuals’ ability to express opinions and ideas without undue government restriction or censorship.
  • C. Sedition Act of 1918
    The Sedition Act of 1918 was a World War I–era U.S. law that expanded restrictions on speech by criminalizing criticism of the government, the Constitution, the military, or the war effort.
  • D. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
    New York Times Co. v. Sullivan is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the “actual malice” standard, greatly expanding First Amendment protections for the press in defamation cases involving public officials.
  • E. Smith Act
    The Smith Act is a 1940 U.S. federal law that criminalized advocating the violent overthrow of the government and was widely used during the early Cold War to prosecute suspected communists.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: The First Amendment did not bar prosecution of the defendant's antiwar publications under the circumstances of the case.
Triple: [Frohwerk v. United States, holding, The First Amendment did not bar prosecution of the defendant's antiwar publications under the circumstances of the case.]
Generated description
The First Amendment did not bar prosecution of the defendant's antiwar publications under the circumstances of the case is the central holding of the 1919 Supreme Court decision Frohwerk v. United States, which upheld convictions for antiwar speech during World War I.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: The First Amendment did not bar prosecution of the defendant's antiwar publications under the circumstances of the case.
Target entity description: The First Amendment did not bar prosecution of the defendant's antiwar publications under the circumstances of the case is the central holding of the 1919 Supreme Court decision Frohwerk v. United States, which upheld convictions for antiwar speech during World War I.
  • A. Schenck v. United States
    Schenck v. United States is a 1919 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the “clear and present danger” test, allowing the government to restrict speech during wartime.
  • B. The Right of Free Speech
    The Right of Free Speech is a fundamental civil liberty that protects individuals’ ability to express opinions and ideas without undue government restriction or censorship.
  • C. Sedition Act of 1918
    The Sedition Act of 1918 was a World War I–era U.S. law that expanded restrictions on speech by criminalizing criticism of the government, the Constitution, the military, or the war effort.
  • D. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan
    New York Times Co. v. Sullivan is a landmark 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the “actual malice” standard, greatly expanding First Amendment protections for the press in defamation cases involving public officials.
  • E. Smith Act
    The Smith Act is a 1940 U.S. federal law that criminalized advocating the violent overthrow of the government and was widely used during the early Cold War to prosecute suspected communists.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (5 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69ab49e279e88190ab10d7248aea9d11 completed March 6, 2026, 9:40 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69abd14ef7d081909159be158bc0ce45 completed March 7, 2026, 7:18 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69af17aea398819092cb14b93abd0ff7 completed March 9, 2026, 6:55 p.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_69af18f9af388190bbb4242c89d4272e completed March 9, 2026, 7:01 p.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_69af198534c0819090c742f39501fac6 completed March 9, 2026, 7:03 p.m.
Created at: March 6, 2026, 9:45 p.m.