Griggs v. Duke Power Co.

E31055

Griggs v. Duke Power Co. is a 1971 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the doctrine of disparate impact in employment discrimination law, holding that seemingly neutral job requirements that disproportionately exclude protected groups can violate Title VII.


Statements (48)
Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
civil rights case
employment discrimination case
arguedDate 1970-12-14
challengedPractice high school diploma requirement for certain jobs
standardized aptitude tests for job placement and promotion
citation 28 L. Ed. 2d 158
401 U.S. 424
91 S. Ct. 849
country United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1971-03-08
decisionType unanimous decision
defendant Duke Power Company
doctrineEstablished disparate impact
employmentContext electric utility company jobs
fullName Griggs et al. v. Duke Power Company
holding Title VII prohibits employment practices that are fair in form but discriminatory in operation
employers must demonstrate that challenged employment requirements are related to job performance
employment practices that have a disparate impact on protected groups must be shown to be job related
good intent or absence of discriminatory intent does not redeem employment procedures that operate as built-in headwinds for minority groups
impactOnGroup African American workers
influenced Equal Employment Opportunity Commission guidelines
subsequent Title VII disparate impact jurisprudence
jurisdiction federal law
legalArea anti-discrimination law
civil rights law
employment law
labor law
legalIssue Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
disparate impact discrimination
educational requirements for employment
employment testing requirements
locationOfFacts North Carolina
opinionAuthor Chief Justice Warren E. Burger
plaintiff African American employees of Duke Power Company
Willie S. Griggs
precedentFor disparate impact analysis in employment discrimination cases
relatedCase Civil Rights Act of 1991
Wards Cove Packing Co. v. Atonio
Washington v. Davis
remedySought elimination of discriminatory employment requirements
equal employment opportunities for African American employees
standardAnnounced business necessity
job relatedness
statuteInterpreted Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964
vote 9-0
yearDecided 1971


Please wait…