Triple

T7094044
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Duke Power Company E165275 entity
Predicate involvedIn P149 FINISHED
Object Griggs v. Duke Power Co. E31055 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Griggs v. Duke Power Co. | Statement: [Duke Power Company, involvedIn, Griggs v. Duke Power Co.]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Griggs v. Duke Power Co.
Context triple: [Duke Power Company, involvedIn, Griggs v. Duke Power Co.]
  • A. Griggs v. Duke Power Co. chosen
    Griggs v. Duke Power Co. is a 1971 U.S. Supreme Court decision that established the doctrine of disparate impact in employment discrimination law, holding that seemingly neutral job requirements that disproportionately exclude protected groups can violate Title VII.
  • B. Yick Wo v. Hopkins
    Yick Wo v. Hopkins is an 1886 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially discriminatory enforcement of a facially neutral law violates the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
  • C. Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.
    Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. is a landmark 2007 U.S. Supreme Court employment discrimination case on pay inequity and the statute of limitations for filing wage discrimination claims under Title VII.
  • D. Employment Division v. Smith
    Employment Division v. Smith is a landmark 1990 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed protections for religious practices under the Free Exercise Clause by upholding the enforcement of neutral, generally applicable laws even when they incidentally burden religion.
  • E. Hall v. DeCuir
    Hall v. DeCuir was an 1878 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited state authority to regulate racial segregation in interstate transportation, reinforcing federal primacy over interstate commerce.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c6887e8c10819091cee237560d32da completed March 27, 2026, 1:39 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6e55159848190a794ad77e60c5525 completed March 27, 2026, 8:15 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c7a31e3fec8190b22da130f7cbaaf9 completed March 28, 2026, 9:45 a.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 2:41 p.m.