Triple

T1440383
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Griggs v. Duke Power Co. E31055 entity
Predicate challengedPractice P29338 FINISHED
Object high school diploma requirement for certain jobs LITERAL FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: high school diploma requirement for certain jobs | Statement: [Griggs v. Duke Power Co., challengedPractice, high school diploma requirement for certain jobs]
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: challengedPractice
Context triple: [Griggs v. Duke Power Co., challengedPractice, high school diploma requirement for certain jobs]
  • A. hasChallenge
    Indicates that an entity faces, experiences, or is confronted with a particular difficulty, obstacle, or problem.
  • B. challengedConcept
    Indicates that one entity has questioned, disputed, or called into doubt the validity, accuracy, or applicability of a particular concept.
  • C. mayBeChallengedBy
    Indicates that one entity is allowed or able to be opposed, questioned, or contested by another entity.
  • D. laterChallengedBy
    Indicates that an earlier claim, decision, or position was subsequently questioned, disputed, or opposed by another party.
  • E. programChallenged
    Indicates that one entity has formally questioned, disputed, or sought to overturn a program, plan, or initiative associated with another entity.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (4 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a4991633388190a4d61b5a98aa407a completed March 1, 2026, 7:52 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4c5ff8dbc81909eafcfc9f2260a22 completed March 1, 2026, 11:04 p.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a4c478f65481909ee716791c663491 completed March 1, 2026, 10:58 p.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a4c5fd2c5c81909283b7a74aff89b7 completed March 1, 2026, 11:04 p.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 8 p.m.