holding
P2237
predicate
Indicates that one entity is physically grasping, carrying, or keeping another entity in its possession or control.
Observed surface forms (1)
- keeps ×3
Sample triples (401)
| Subject | Object |
|---|---|
| Helvering v. Bruun | A landlord realizes taxable income when repossessing property that has been enhanced in value by improvements made by a tenant ⓘ |
| Helvering v. Bruun | The increase in value attributable to tenant-made improvements can constitute realized income to the landlord upon repossession ⓘ |
| Helvering v. Gregory | A transaction must have a genuine business purpose beyond tax avoidance to be respected for tax purposes. ⓘ |
| Helvering v. Gregory | A transaction that complies with the literal language of the statute may still be disregarded if it is a mere device to avoid tax. ⓘ |
| Helvering v. Horst | the donor of interest coupons who retained ownership of the bonds was taxable on the interest income paid to the donee ⓘ |
| Hicklin v. Orbeck | Alaska could not discriminate against nonresident workers in access to employment related to oil and gas development ⓘ |
| Hicklin v. Orbeck | Alaska’s local-hire law violated the Privileges and Immunities Clause ⓘ |
| Hines v. Davidowitz | Federal alien-registration law preempts conflicting state alien-registration laws. ⓘ |
| Hines v. Davidowitz | States may not impose additional or conflicting alien-registration requirements where Congress has enacted a comprehensive federal scheme. ⓘ |
| Hirabayashi v. United States | The Supreme Court affirmed Hirabayashi’s conviction for violating the curfew and exclusion orders. NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Hirabayashi v. United States | The Supreme Court held that the curfew order was a valid exercise of the war powers of Congress and the President. NERFINISHED ⓘ |
| Hirabayashi v. United States | The Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a wartime curfew imposed on Japanese Americans on the West Coast. ⓘ |
| Hobbie v. Unemployment Appeals Commission of Florida | A state may not deny unemployment benefits to a worker who is fired for refusing, on newly adopted religious grounds, to work on her Sabbath ⓘ |
| Hobbie v. Unemployment Appeals Commission of Florida | Denial of unemployment benefits in these circumstances violates the Free Exercise Clause ⓘ |
| INS v. Chadha | Congress must comply with bicameralism and presentment to take legislative action ⓘ |
| INS v. Chadha | Section 244(c)(2) of the Immigration and Nationality Act is unconstitutional ⓘ |
| INS v. Chadha | one-house legislative veto provisions are unconstitutional ⓘ |
|
In re Debs Supreme Court case
surface form:
In re Debs
|
The contempt convictions of Eugene V. Debs and others for violating a federal injunction were upheld. ⓘ |
|
In re Debs Supreme Court case
surface form:
In re Debs
|
The federal government may obtain injunctions to halt labor strikes that interfere with interstate commerce and the mails. ⓘ |
|
In re Debs Supreme Court case
surface form:
In re Debs
|
Federal government
ⓘ
surface form:
The federal government may use troops to enforce federal court injunctions and ensure the operation of interstate commerce and the mails.
|
| Jackson v. Georgia | The imposition and carrying out of the death penalty in the case violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments as applied ⓘ |
| Jay Printz, Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana, et al. v. United States | Congress may not compel state executive officers to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program ⓘ |
| Katzenbach v. McClung | Congress may prohibit racial discrimination in restaurants under the Commerce Clause ⓘ |
| Katzenbach v. McClung |
Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States
ⓘ
surface form:
Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 is a valid exercise of Congress’s commerce power as applied to local restaurants
|
| Katzenbach v. McClung | racial discrimination in restaurants serving food that has moved in interstate commerce may be regulated by Congress ⓘ |
| Katzenbach v. Morgan | Congress may use its power under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment to prohibit enforcement of state laws that it deems to violate equal protection, even if the Supreme Court has not independently found a constitutional violation ⓘ |
| Katzenbach v. Morgan | Section 4(e) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 is a valid exercise of Congress’s power under Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ |
| King v. Burwell | Tax credits are available for health insurance purchased on any exchange created under the Affordable Care Act, whether established by a state or by the federal government ⓘ |
| King v. Burwell | The phrase "an Exchange established by the State" is interpreted in the context of the statute as a whole to include federally facilitated exchanges ⓘ |
| Korematsu v. United States | upheld the exclusion and internment of Japanese Americans during World War II as a valid exercise of war powers ⓘ |
|
Lawrence v. Texas (in part)
surface form:
Lawrence v. Texas
|
laws criminalizing private consensual sexual conduct between adults of the same sex are unconstitutional ⓘ |
|
Lawrence v. Texas (in part)
surface form:
Lawrence v. Texas
|
the Texas Homosexual Conduct law violates the Due Process Clause ⓘ |
|
Lawrence v. Texas (in part)
surface form:
Lawrence v. Texas
|
the state cannot demean the existence or control the destiny of persons by making their private sexual conduct a crime ⓘ |
| Lee v. Weisman | Clergy-led prayer at public school graduation ceremonies violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment. ⓘ |
| Lee v. Weisman | Including state-sponsored, clergy-delivered prayers in public school graduation ceremonies is unconstitutional. ⓘ |
| Lemon v. Kurtzman | Certain state programs providing financial aid to church-related educational institutions violate the Establishment Clause ⓘ |
| Lochner v. New York | New York law limiting bakers to 60 hours of work per week and 10 hours per day violates the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ |
| Lochner v. New York | freedom of contract is protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ |
| Loving v. Virginia | marriage is a fundamental right under the Due Process Clause ⓘ |
| Loving v. Virginia | racial classifications in marriage laws violate the Equal Protection Clause ⓘ |
| Loving v. Virginia | state laws banning interracial marriage are unconstitutional ⓘ |
| Mapp v. Ohio | Evidence obtained in violation of the Fourth Amendment is inadmissible in state criminal prosecutions ⓘ |
| Mapp v. Ohio | The exclusionary rule applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ |
|
Dollree Mapp
surface form:
Mapp v. Ohio
|
exclusionary rule applies to the states through the Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ |
| Marbury v. Madison | A writ of mandamus was the appropriate remedy for Marbury, but the Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction to issue it in this case. ⓘ |
| Marbury v. Madison | Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, to the extent it purported to expand the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction, was unconstitutional. ⓘ |
| Marbury v. Madison | The Supreme Court has the authority to review acts of Congress and determine whether they are unconstitutional. ⓘ |
| Marbury v. Madison |
Marbury v. Madison
self-linksurface differs
ⓘ
surface form:
William Marbury had a right to his commission as justice of the peace.
|
| Maryland v. Wirtz | Congress could extend Fair Labor Standards Act coverage to employees of state-operated schools and hospitals under the Commerce Clause ⓘ |
| Maryland v. Wirtz | federal minimum wage and overtime provisions validly applied to certain state employees ⓘ |