Marbury v. Madison

E657

Marbury v. Madison is the landmark 1803 U.S. Supreme Court case that established the principle of judicial review, empowering federal courts to strike down laws that violate the Constitution.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (3)

Statements (49)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
constitutional law case
judicial review case
landmark case
branchChecked executive branch
legislative branch
chiefJustice John Marshall
citation 1 Cranch 137
5 U.S. 137
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Article III
surface form: Article III of the United States Constitution

Supremacy Clause
country United States of America
surface form: United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1803-02-24
defendant James Madison
defendantOffice United States Secretary of State
field United States constitutional law
federal courts and jurisdiction
fullName Marbury v. Madison self-linksurface differs
surface form: Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)
historicalContext conflict between Federalists and Democratic-Republicans
early years of the Jefferson administration
holding A writ of mandamus was the appropriate remedy for Marbury, but the Supreme Court lacked jurisdiction to issue it in this case.
Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789, to the extent it purported to expand the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction, was unconstitutional.
The Supreme Court has the authority to review acts of Congress and determine whether they are unconstitutional.
Marbury v. Madison self-linksurface differs
surface form: William Marbury had a right to his commission as justice of the peace.
impact established the Supreme Court as a coequal branch of government with power to invalidate unconstitutional laws
issue power of federal courts to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional
scope of the Supreme Court’s original jurisdiction under Article III of the U.S. Constitution
validity of undelivered judicial commissions signed by an outgoing president
jurisdictionType original jurisdiction (sought)
languageOfOpinion English
legalSystem common law
locationOfCourt Washington, D.C.
opinionBy John Marshall
outgoingPresidentInvolved John Adams
plaintiff William Marbury
presidentInvolved Thomas Jefferson
principleEstablished it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is
judicial review
the Constitution is superior to ordinary legislation
remedySought writ of mandamus
sectionInterpreted Judiciary Act of 1789
surface form: Section 13 of the Judiciary Act of 1789
statuteInterpreted Judiciary Act of 1789
taughtIn law school constitutional law courses
topic checks and balances
federal courts
separation of powers
unanimousDecision true
yearDecided 1803

Referenced by (22)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Marbury v. Madison fullName Marbury v. Madison self-linksurface differs
this entity surface form: Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. (1 Cranch) 137 (1803)
Marbury v. Madison holding Marbury v. Madison self-linksurface differs
this entity surface form: William Marbury had a right to his commission as justice of the peace.
Early Republic of the United States hasPart Marbury v. Madison
John Marshall notableWork Marbury v. Madison
William Marbury notableEvent Marbury v. Madison
William Marbury legalCase Marbury v. Madison
Hylton v. United States relatedCase Marbury v. Madison
Presidency of Thomas Jefferson majorEvent Marbury v. Madison
Marshall Court era hasKeyDecision Marbury v. Madison
John Marshall Court landmarkCase Marbury v. Madison
political question doctrine developedInCase Marbury v. Madison
Fletcher v. Peck relatedTo Marbury v. Madison
United States Supreme Court cases hasPart Marbury v. Madison
Judiciary Act of 1801 relatedCase Marbury v. Madison
Midnight Judges significantEvent Marbury v. Madison
Midnight Judges followedBy Marbury v. Madison
Marshall Court significantCase Marbury v. Madison