Hylton v. United States

E48110

Hylton v. United States was an 1796 U.S. Supreme Court case that is historically significant as one of the Court’s earliest exercises of judicial review in upholding a federal tax on carriages.

Jump to: Statements Referenced by

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
landmark United States Supreme Court case
appliedProvision Article I, Section 2 of the United States Constitution
Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution
surface form: Article I, Section 8 of the United States Constitution

Article I, Section 9 of the United States Constitution
Direct Tax Clause of the United States Constitution
Taxing and Spending Clause
surface form: Taxing and Spending Clause of the United States Constitution
areaOfLaw constitutional law
federal courts
tax law
citationStatus good law
constitutionalQuestion extent of congressional power to impose excise taxes
whether the carriage tax was a direct tax that had to be apportioned among the states
country United States of America
surface form: United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
dateDecided 1796
decisionType unanimous decision in result
defendant United States of America
surface form: United States
governmentalBodyInvolved United States Congress
governmentBranch judicial branch of the United States
hasJurisdiction Supreme Court of the United States
held a federal tax on carriages was constitutional
the carriage tax was not a direct tax requiring apportionment among the states
historicalEra early United States Republic
languageOfRecord English
legalIssue constitutionality of a federal tax on carriages
meaning of direct taxes under the U.S. Constitution
scope of the federal taxing power
locationOfCourt Philadelphia
partyType individual versus federal government
plaintiff Daniel Hylton
precedentFor later cases interpreting the Direct Tax Clause
later cases on the scope of judicial review
relatedCase Marbury v. Madison
relatedConcept apportionment of direct taxes
enumerated powers of Congress
federal taxation
judicial review
result federal statute upheld
significance early interpretation of the constitutional distinction between direct and indirect taxes
one of the earliest exercises of judicial review by the U.S. Supreme Court
precedent on the scope of congressional taxing power
subjectMatter federal revenue measure
timePeriod 18th century
topic United States constitutional history
early Supreme Court jurisprudence
typeOfTax federal carriage tax
yearDecided 1796

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Ware v. Hylton relatedCase Hylton v. United States