constitutionalChallenge

P1122 predicate

Indicates a legal action or argument asserting that a law, policy, or governmental act violates a constitution and should be reviewed or invalidated.

Aliases (10)
  • stateLawChallenged ×9
  • challengedProvision ×5
  • reviewsConstitutionalityOf ×4
  • canBeChallengedOnGroundsOf ×3
  • constitutionalQuestion ×3
  • constitutionalClaim ×2
  • lawChallenged ×2
  • unconstitutionalityReason ×2
  • checksConstitutionality ×1
  • constitutionalReviewPower ×1

Sample triples (36)
Subject Object
Acts of Parliament incompatibility with human rights (under the Human Rights Act 1998) ("canBeChallengedOnGroundsOf")
Acts of the Northern Ireland Assembly incompatibility with Convention rights ("canBeChallengedOnGroundsOf")
Acts of the Northern Ireland Assembly legislative competence ("canBeChallengedOnGroundsOf")
Baker v. Nelson Minnesota marriage law restricting marriage to opposite-sex couples ("stateLawChallenged")
Bituminous Coal Conservation Act of 1935 attempted to regulate local production rather than interstate commerce ("unconstitutionalityReason")
Bituminous Coal Conservation Act of 1935 exceeded Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause ("unconstitutionalityReason")
Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act Printz v. United States
California v. Texas 26 U.S.C. § 5000A (individual mandate) ("challengedProvision")
Chamber of Deputies (Luxembourg) through legislative process and referrals to courts ("checksConstitutionality")
DeBoer v. Snyder Due Process Clause ("constitutionalClaim")
DeBoer v. Snyder Equal Protection Clause ("constitutionalClaim")
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization Mississippi law banning most abortions after 15 weeks of pregnancy ("lawChallenged")
Everson v. Board of Education New Jersey statute authorizing reimbursement for transportation to schools ("stateLawChallenged")
Heart of Atlanta Motel, Inc. v. United States Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ("challengedProvision")
Hylton v. United States extent of congressional power to impose excise taxes ("constitutionalQuestion")
Hylton v. United States whether the carriage tax was a direct tax that had to be apportioned among the states ("constitutionalQuestion")
Katzenbach v. Morgan New York English literacy requirement for voter registration ("stateLawChallenged")
Mississippi Gestational Age Act whether pre-viability abortion bans are permissible under the U.S. Constitution ("constitutionalQuestion")
Morgan v. Virginia Virginia statute requiring racial segregation on interstate buses ("stateLawChallenged")
New York v. United States (1992) take-title provision of the Low-Level Radioactive Waste Policy Amendments Act of 1985 ("challengedProvision")
Reed v. Reed Idaho probate code provision preferring men over women as estate administrators ("lawChallenged")
Romer v. Evans Colorado Amendment 2 ("challengedProvision")
Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 Shelby County v. Holder
Social Security Act of 1935 Helvering v. Davis
Social Security Act of 1935 Steward Machine Co. v. Davis
Supreme Court of Japan laws ("reviewsConstitutionalityOf")
Supreme Court of Japan official acts ("reviewsConstitutionalityOf")
Supreme Court of Japan orders ("reviewsConstitutionalityOf")
Supreme Court of Japan regulations ("reviewsConstitutionalityOf")
Tanco v. Haslam Tennessee constitutional amendment defining marriage as between one man and one woman ("stateLawChallenged")
Tanco v. Haslam Tennessee statutory provisions limiting marriage to opposite-sex couples ("stateLawChallenged")
Toomer v. Witsell South Carolina statute regulating commercial shrimp fishing ("stateLawChallenged")
Windsor v. United States (in part) Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act ("challengedProvision")
Wisconsin v. Yoder Wisconsin compulsory school attendance law requiring attendance until age 16 ("stateLawChallenged")
Zschernig v. Miller Oregon ("stateLawChallenged")
district courts of Japan incidental review of constitutionality of laws ("constitutionalReviewPower")

Please wait…