Triple
T186427
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | district courts of Japan |
E3990
|
entity |
| Predicate | constitutionalReviewPower |
P1122
|
FINISHED |
| Object | incidental review of constitutionality of laws |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: incidental review of constitutionality of laws | Statement: [district courts of Japan, constitutionalReviewPower, incidental review of constitutionality of laws]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: constitutionalReviewPower Context triple: [district courts of Japan, constitutionalReviewPower, incidental review of constitutionality of laws]
-
A.
constitutionalFunction
Indicates that an entity serves a role, duty, or purpose as defined or required by a constitution or foundational governing framework.
-
B.
constitutionalCategory
Indicates the classification of something according to its constitutional or structural type or category.
-
C.
constitutionalNumber
Indicates that an entity has a specific number or count defined or constrained by a constitution or foundational governing document.
-
D.
constitutionalChallenge
chosen
Indicates a legal action or argument asserting that a law, policy, or governmental act violates a constitution and should be reviewed or invalidated.
-
E.
constitutionalContext
Indicates that something occurs, is interpreted, or is evaluated within the framework, principles, or provisions of a constitution.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69a25497e2f08190a040f8c6e1842643 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:36 a.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69a2594809288190b3d3b1283e7e0d00 |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:56 a.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69a25670feb081908e26a2543ebe7b3a |
completed | Feb. 28, 2026, 2:44 a.m. |
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:40 a.m.