Everson v. Board of Education

E34342

Everson v. Board of Education is a 1947 U.S. Supreme Court case that applied the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause to the states and articulated the modern “wall of separation between church and state” doctrine.

All labels observed (4)

How this entity was disambiguated

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Establishment Clause case ⓘ
United States Supreme Court case ⓘ
landmark case ⓘ
appliedThrough Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ
appliedTo states ⓘ
areaOfLaw church–state relations ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ
arguedUnder First Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ
citation 330 U.S. 1 ⓘ
citedPhraseSource Jefferson’s letter to the Danbury Baptists ⓘ
citedSource Notes on the State of Virginia ⓘ
surface form: writings of Thomas Jefferson
concerns reimbursement of transportation costs for children attending parochial schools ⓘ
use of public funds in relation to religious schools ⓘ
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Establishment Clause ⓘ
surface form: First Amendment Establishment Clause

Due Process Clause ⓘ
surface form: Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause
country United States of America ⓘ
surface form: United States
courtTerm October Term 1946 ⓘ
decidedBy Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ
decisionDate 1947-02-10 ⓘ
dissentingOpinionBy Felix Frankfurter ⓘ
surface form: Justice Felix Frankfurter

Justice Frank Murphy ⓘ
Robert H. Jackson ⓘ
surface form: Justice Robert H. Jackson

Justice Wiley B. Rutledge ⓘ
fullCaseName Everson v. Board of Education self-linksurface differs ⓘ
surface form: Everson v. Board of Education of the Township of Ewing
hasJurisdiction United States of America ⓘ
surface form: United States
held Establishment Clause applies to state and local governments ⓘ
reimbursement for transportation to parochial schools did not violate the Establishment Clause ⓘ
influenced subsequent Establishment Clause jurisprudence ⓘ
involvesClause Establishment Clause ⓘ
joinedByInMajority Chief Justice Fred M. Vinson ⓘ
Justice Harold H. Burton ⓘ
Justice Stanley Reed ⓘ
William O. Douglas ⓘ
surface form: Justice William O. Douglas
keyPhrase wall of separation between church and state ⓘ
languageOfProceedings English ⓘ
legalDoctrineArticulated wall of separation between church and state ⓘ
legalIssue whether a New Jersey statute violated the Establishment Clause ⓘ
majorityOpinionBy Hugo L. Black ⓘ
surface form: Justice Hugo Black
originatedIn New Jersey, United States ⓘ
surface form: New Jersey
party Arch R. Everson ⓘ
Board of Education of the Township of Ewing ⓘ
relatedConcept incorporation doctrine ⓘ
relatedTo Engel v. Vitale ⓘ
Lemon v. Kurtzman ⓘ
Reynolds v. United States ⓘ
stateLawChallenged New Jersey statute authorizing reimbursement for transportation to schools ⓘ
vote 5–4 ⓘ
yearDecided 1947 ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (13)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Establishment Clause → incorporatedByCase → Everson v. Board of Education ⓘ
Establishment Clause → keyCase → Everson v. Board of Education ⓘ
Cantwell v. Connecticut → relatedCase → Everson v. Board of Education ⓘ
State of Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes → relatedCase → Everson v. Board of Education ⓘ
this entity surface form: Epperson v. Arkansas
Lemon v. Kurtzman → relatedCase → Everson v. Board of Education ⓘ
Everson v. Board of Education → fullCaseName → Everson v. Board of Education self-linksurface differs ⓘ
this entity surface form: Everson v. Board of Education of the Township of Ewing
Board of Education of the Township of Ewing → partyTo → Everson v. Board of Education ⓘ
Jefferson’s letter to the Danbury Baptists → citedInCase → Everson v. Board of Education ⓘ
Arch R. Everson → notableFor → Everson v. Board of Education ⓘ
Arch R. Everson → partyInCase → Everson v. Board of Education ⓘ
Arch R. Everson → caseCitation → Everson v. Board of Education ⓘ
this entity surface form: Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 (1947)