McCullen v. Coakley

E176639

McCullen v. Coakley is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down Massachusetts’ abortion-clinic buffer zone law as violating the First Amendment’s free speech protections.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
McCullen v. Coakley canonical 2

Statements (51)

Predicate Object
instanceOf First Amendment case
United States Supreme Court case
abortion-related legal case
freedom of speech case
citation 134 S. Ct. 2518
189 L. Ed. 2d 502
573 U.S. 464
concurrenceBy Anthony M. Kennedy
surface form: Justice Anthony M. Kennedy

Antonin Scalia
surface form: Justice Antonin Scalia

Clarence Thomas
surface form: Justice Clarence Thomas

Samuel A. Alito Jr.
surface form: Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr.
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted First Amendment to the United States Constitution
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 2014-06-26
decisionType unanimous judgment
docketNumber 12-1168
governmentInterestAsserted orderly movement on public sidewalks and streets
public safety
unimpeded access to reproductive health care facilities
holding Massachusetts’ 35-foot abortion-clinic buffer zone law violates the First Amendment
The law burdens substantially more speech than necessary to achieve the Commonwealth’s asserted interests
The statute is not narrowly tailored to serve significant governmental interests in public safety and patient access
issue whether fixed buffer zones around abortion clinics violate free speech rights on public sidewalks
joinedMajority John G. Roberts Jr.
surface form: Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.

Anthony M. Kennedy
surface form: Justice Anthony M. Kennedy

Antonin Scalia
surface form: Justice Antonin Scalia

Clarence Thomas
surface form: Justice Clarence Thomas

Elena Kagan
surface form: Justice Elena Kagan

Ruth Bader Ginsburg
surface form: Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Samuel A. Alito Jr.
surface form: Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr.

Sonia Sotomayor
surface form: Justice Sonia Sotomayor

Stephen G. Breyer
surface form: Justice Stephen G. Breyer
jurisdiction United States of America
surface form: United States
lawChallenged Massachusetts Reproductive Health Care Facilities Act (as amended in 2007)
lawFeatureChallenged 35-foot fixed buffer zones around entrances, exits, and driveways of reproductive health care facilities
lowerCourtDecision affirmed constitutionality of Massachusetts buffer zone law
opinionOfTheCourtBy John G. Roberts Jr.
surface form: Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr.
originatingCourt United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
originatingJurisdiction Massachusetts
surface form: Commonwealth of Massachusetts
petitioner Eleanor McCullen
relatedCase Hill v. Colorado
relatedTopic content-neutral time, place, and manner restrictions
respondent Martha Coakley
respondentOffice Massachusetts Attorney General
surface form: Attorney General of Massachusetts
result Massachusetts buffer zone statute struck down
speechLocation public sidewalks outside abortion clinics
speechTypeInvolved sidewalk counseling
standardApplied narrow tailoring requirement for time, place, and manner restrictions
subsequentImpact limited states’ ability to use large fixed buffer zones around abortion clinics
term October Term 2013
vote 9-0 on invalidating the law

Referenced by (2)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Assembly Clause usedInCase McCullen v. Coakley
October Term 2013 hasPart McCullen v. Coakley