Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: McCullen v. Coakley | Statement: [October Term 2013, hasPart, McCullen v. Coakley]

Target entity: McCullen v. Coakley
Context triple: [October Term 2013, hasPart, McCullen v. Coakley]

• A. McCullen v. Coakley chosen
  McCullen v. Coakley is a 2014 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down Massachusetts’ abortion-clinic buffer zone law as violating the First Amendment’s free speech protections.
• B. Maine v. Moulton
  Maine v. Moulton is a 1985 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded Sixth Amendment protections by holding that the government violates the right to counsel when it deliberately elicits incriminating statements from an indicted defendant through a cooperating co-defendant acting as an informant.
• C. Memoirs v. Massachusetts
  Memoirs v. Massachusetts is a 1966 U.S. Supreme Court decision that refined the legal test for obscenity under the First Amendment, further protecting controversial literary works from censorship.
• D. Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts
  Melendez-Diaz v. Massachusetts is a 2009 U.S. Supreme Court decision holding that forensic laboratory reports are testimonial evidence and that defendants have a Sixth Amendment right to confront the analysts who prepared them.
• E. Cantwell v. Connecticut
  Cantwell v. Connecticut is a 1940 U.S. Supreme Court case that first applied the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause to the states, striking down a state law that improperly restricted religious proselytizing.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.