Jay Printz, Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana, et al. v. United States

E85756

Jay Printz, Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana, et al. v. United States is the formal case title of the U.S. Supreme Court decision commonly known as Printz v. United States, which addressed the limits of federal power to compel state officials to enforce federal law.


Statements (41)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
areaOfLaw United States federalism
constitutional law
arguedDate 1996-12-03
challengedStatute Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act
citation 521 U.S. 898
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Article I of the United States Constitution
Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
country United States of America
surface form: United States
decisionDate 1997-06-27
decisionType landmark decision
dissentingOpinionBy David H. Souter NERFINISHED
John Paul Stevens NERFINISHED
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Stephen G. Breyer NERFINISHED
docketNumber 95-1478
95-1503
effect strengthened the anti-commandeering principle limiting federal power over states
fullCaseName Jay Printz, Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana, et al. v. United States self-link
hasShortTitle Printz v. United States
holding Congress may not compel state executive officers to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program
joinedMajorityJustice Anthony M. Kennedy NERFINISHED
Clarence Thomas NERFINISHED
Sandra Day O’Connor
surface form: Sandra Day O'Connor

William H. Rehnquist
jurisdiction Supreme Court of the United States
legalIssue Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
anti-commandeering doctrine
federalism
separation of powers between federal and state governments
majorityOpinionBy Antonin Scalia NERFINISHED
petitioner Jay Printz
petitionerRole Sheriff of Ravalli County, Montana
surface form: Sheriff/Coroner of Ravalli County, Montana
rearguedDate 1997-01-14
relatedCase Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association (2018)
surface form: Murphy v. National Collegiate Athletic Association

New York v. United States (1992)
surface form: New York v. United States
relatedDoctrine New Federalism
surface form: New Federalism (United States)
respondent United States of America
surface form: United States
subjectMatter gun control background checks
temporary duties imposed on state and local law enforcement
termOfCourt October Term 1996

Referenced by (2)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Jay Printz, Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana, et al. v. United States fullCaseName Jay Printz, Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana, et al. v. United States self-link
Printz v. United States fullCaseName Jay Printz, Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana, et al. v. United States