Triple

T3981011
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Jay Printz, Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana, et al. v. United States E85756 entity
Predicate fullCaseName P3131 FINISHED
Object Jay Printz, Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana, et al. v. United States E85756 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Jay Printz, Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana, et al. v. United States | Statement: [Jay Printz, Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana, et al. v. United States, fullCaseName, Jay Printz, Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana, et al. v. United States]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Jay Printz, Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana, et al. v. United States
Context triple: [Jay Printz, Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana, et al. v. United States, fullCaseName, Jay Printz, Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana, et al. v. United States]
  • A. Jay Printz, Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana, et al. v. United States chosen
    Jay Printz, Sheriff/Coroner, Ravalli County, Montana, et al. v. United States is the formal case title of the U.S. Supreme Court decision commonly known as Printz v. United States, which addressed the limits of federal power to compel state officials to enforce federal law.
  • B. Baldwin v. Fish and Game Commission of Montana
    Baldwin v. Fish and Game Commission of Montana is a 1978 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld Montana’s higher elk-hunting license fees for nonresidents and narrowed the scope of the Privileges and Immunities Clause to exclude purely recreational activities.
  • C. Wolf v. Colorado
    Wolf v. Colorado was a 1949 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held the Fourth Amendment’s exclusionary rule did not apply to the states, a position later reversed by Mapp v. Ohio.
  • D. Arizona v. United States
    Arizona v. United States is a 2012 U.S. Supreme Court case that limited state authority over immigration enforcement by affirming broad federal power in this area.
  • E. Kleppe v. New Mexico
    Kleppe v. New Mexico is a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that affirmed broad federal authority over public lands and wildlife under the Constitution’s Property Clause.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed93908348190a26c8aaf4fab3e86 completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aef9d9d8848190aa06eaf5d281fa16 completed March 9, 2026, 4:48 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b54021ae388190a9518ea85b760736 completed March 14, 2026, 11:01 a.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:33 p.m.