Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
E32808
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of race-conscious admissions policies at public universities under the Equal Protection Clause.
Aliases (4)
Statements (49)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
→
affirmative action case → equal protection case → |
| arguedDate |
October 10, 2012
→
|
| citation |
133 S. Ct. 2411
→
186 L. Ed. 2d 474 → 570 U.S. 297 → |
| concurrenceBy |
Antonin Scalia
→
Clarence Thomas → |
| constitutionalProvision |
Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
→
|
| country |
United States
→
|
| court |
Supreme Court of the United States
→
|
| decidedDate |
June 24, 2013
→
|
| disposition |
Judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit vacated and case remanded.
→
|
| dissentBy |
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
→
|
| docketNumber |
11-345
→
|
| fullName |
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
→
|
| holding |
Courts must verify that a university’s use of race in admissions is narrowly tailored to obtain the educational benefits of diversity.
→
The Fifth Circuit did not apply the correct standard of strict scrutiny to the University of Texas at Austin’s use of race in undergraduate admissions. → |
| impact |
clarified the application of strict scrutiny to race-conscious admissions policies at public universities.
→
|
| joinedByInMajority |
Antonin Scalia
→
Clarence Thomas → Elena Kagan recused → John G. Roberts Jr. → Samuel A. Alito Jr. → Sonia Sotomayor → Stephen G. Breyer → |
| jurisdiction |
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (on appeal)
→
|
| legalIssue |
constitutionality of race-conscious undergraduate admissions policies at public universities
→
standard of judicial review for race-based affirmative action in higher education → |
| majorityOpinionBy |
Anthony M. Kennedy
→
|
| originatingCourt |
United States District Court for the Western District of Texas
→
|
| petitioner |
Abigail Noel Fisher
→
|
| relatedCase |
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2016)
→
Gratz v. Bollinger → Grutter v. Bollinger → Regents of the University of California v. Bakke → |
| respondent |
UT Austin Office of Admissions
→
University of Texas at Austin → |
| shortName |
Fisher I
→
Fisher v. Texas → |
| standardOfReview |
strict scrutiny
→
|
| subjectMatter |
civil rights
→
constitutional law → public university admissions → |
| subsequentHistory |
On remand, the Fifth Circuit again upheld the University of Texas at Austin’s admissions policy.
→
The Supreme Court later affirmed the University of Texas at Austin’s policy in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2016). → |
| topic |
affirmative action in higher education
→
race-conscious admissions policies → |
Referenced by (9)
| Subject (surface form when different) | Predicate |
|---|---|
|
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
→
|
fullName |
|
Bakke
("influenced later affirmative action cases such as Fisher v. University of Texas")
→
|
impact |
|
October Term 2012
→
|
includesCase |
|
NAACP Legal Defense and Educational Fund
→
|
notableCase |
|
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
("Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2016)")
→
|
relatedCase |
|
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
("Fisher v. Texas")
→
|
shortName |
|
Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
→
|
subsequentCaseInfluenced |
|
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
("The Supreme Court later affirmed the University of Texas at Austin’s policy in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2016).")
→
|
subsequentHistory |
|
Grutter v. Bollinger
→
|
subsequentLimitationBy |