Triple

T4296532
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Bakke E99726 entity
Predicate impact P9 FINISHED
Object influenced later affirmative action cases such as Fisher v. University of Texas E32808 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: influenced later affirmative action cases such as Fisher v. University of Texas | Statement: [Bakke, impact, influenced later affirmative action cases such as Fisher v. University of Texas]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: influenced later affirmative action cases such as Fisher v. University of Texas
Context triple: [Bakke, impact, influenced later affirmative action cases such as Fisher v. University of Texas]
  • A. Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin chosen
    Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of race-conscious admissions policies at public universities under the Equal Protection Clause.
  • B. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
    Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down rigid racial quotas in university admissions while upholding the constitutionality of using race as one factor among many to foster diversity.
  • C. Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action (dissent on affirmative action)
    Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action (dissent on affirmative action) is Justice Sonia Sotomayor’s powerful Supreme Court dissent criticizing a Michigan constitutional amendment that banned race-conscious admissions policies in public universities.
  • D. Grutter v. Bollinger
    Grutter v. Bollinger is a landmark 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the limited use of race as one factor in holistic law school admissions to promote educational diversity.
  • E. Gratz v. Bollinger
    Gratz v. Bollinger is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the University of Michigan’s undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause by awarding automatic points based on race.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b3455175088190aa79c6e03b86647e completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b3509aebd48190af38f2e37f07869a completed March 12, 2026, 11:47 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b5c7439b3481908d2554f7b86002aa completed March 14, 2026, 8:38 p.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:08 p.m.