limitedByCourtCase

P8832
predicate

Indicates that one entity’s scope, effect, or applicability is restricted or constrained as a result of a specific court case or legal proceeding.

All labels observed (8)

Label Occurrences
laterLimitedBy 10
limitedByCourtCase canonical 2
limitedByDecision 2

Description generation (PDg)

The one-sentence description above was generated by prompting gpt-5.1 with the predicate name and this instruction.

Instruction
Given a predicate that represents a relationship or action between entities, generate a one-sentence description explaining its meaning.  
# Instructions
Focus on describing the relationship, not the entities themselves. 
# Response Format
Begin the description with \' Indicates...\'
Input
Predicate: limitedByCourtCase
Generated description
Indicates that one entity’s scope, effect, or applicability is restricted or constrained as a result of a specific court case or legal proceeding.

Sample triples (21)

Subject Object
Religious Freedom Restoration Act City of Boerne v. Flores
Enabling Act of 1933 yes via predicate surface "limitedJudicialReview"
Civil Rights Act of 1875 Civil Rights Act of 1875 self-linksurface differs
surface form: Civil Rights Cases
Voting Rights Act of 1965 Shelby County v. Holder via predicate surface "affectedByCourtDecision"
surface form: Shelby County v. Holder (2013)
Sherbert v. Verner Employment Division v. Smith via predicate surface "laterLimitedBy"
Paul v. Virginia United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association via predicate surface "laterLimitedBy"
Section 4(b)
surface form: Section 4(b) of the Voting Rights Act of 1965
June 25, 2013 via predicate surface "limitedByDecisionOn"
Maryland v. Wirtz National League of Cities v. Usery via predicate surface "laterLimitedBy"
Corrigan v. Buckley Shelley v. Kraemer via predicate surface "laterLimitedBy"
Corrigan v. Buckley Hurd v. Hodge via predicate surface "laterLimitedBy"
Massive Resistance strategy against school desegregation Cooper v. Aaron via predicate surface "limitedByDecision"
Massive Resistance strategy against school desegregation Griffin v. County School Board of Prince Edward County via predicate surface "limitedByDecision"
Malloy v. Hogan Adamson v. California via predicate surface "limitedOrRejectedPrecedent"
Stenberg v. Carhart Gonzales v. Carhart via predicate surface "laterLimitedBy"
South African Constitution of 1983 yes via predicate surface "limitedJudicialReview"
Myers v. United States Humphrey’s Executor v. United States via predicate surface "laterLimitedBy"
Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College Regents of the University of California v. Bakke via predicate surface "limitedPrecedent"
Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin via predicate surface "limitedPrecedent"
Goldman v. United States Katz v. United States via predicate surface "laterLimitedBy" NERFINISHED
Goldman v. United States shift to privacy-based Fourth Amendment doctrine via predicate surface "laterLimitedBy"
De donis conditionalibus Fines and Recoveries Act 1833 via predicate surface "laterLimitedBy" NERFINISHED