Triple

T253217
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Religious Freedom Restoration Act E5195 entity
Predicate limitedByCourtCase P8832 FINISHED
Object City of Boerne v. Flores
City of Boerne v. Flores is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that curtailed Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment and held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act could not be applied to the states.
E39104 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (5 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: City of Boerne v. Flores | Statement: [Religious Freedom Restoration Act, limitedByCourtCase, City of Boerne v. Flores]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: City of Boerne v. Flores
Context triple: [Religious Freedom Restoration Act, limitedByCourtCase, City of Boerne v. Flores]
  • A. Van Orden v. Perry
    Van Orden v. Perry is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of a Ten Commandments monument on Texas State Capitol grounds against an Establishment Clause challenge.
  • B. Lynch v. Donnelly
    Lynch v. Donnelly is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the inclusion of a nativity scene in a city’s Christmas display and helped shape modern Establishment Clause analysis of government endorsement of religion.
  • C. DeBoer v. Snyder
    DeBoer v. Snyder was a federal court case challenging Michigan’s same-sex marriage ban that became one of the key cases consolidated into the landmark Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
  • D. South Dakota v. Dole
    South Dakota v. Dole is a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to condition federal highway funds on states adopting a minimum drinking age of 21, helping define the scope of the federal spending power.
  • E. Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah
    Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah is a 1993 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down city ordinances targeting Santería animal sacrifice and clarified that laws burdening religious practice must be neutral and generally applicable under the Free Exercise Clause.
  • F. None of above. chosen
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
NEDg Description generation gpt-5.1
Instruction
Generate a one-sentence description of the target entity. 
You are given a context triple in the form (subject, predicate, object), where the object is the target entity. 
# Instructions
Use the triple to infer relevant information about the entity. Describe the entity based on what is most defining, well-known. 
Avoid repeating the information from the triple, unless really essential.
# Response Format
Return only the sentence: "Description: [one-sentence description of the target entity]"
Input
Entity: City of Boerne v. Flores
Triple: [Religious Freedom Restoration Act, limitedByCourtCase, City of Boerne v. Flores]
Generated description
City of Boerne v. Flores is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that curtailed Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment and held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act could not be applied to the states.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: City of Boerne v. Flores
Target entity description: City of Boerne v. Flores is a 1997 U.S. Supreme Court case that curtailed Congress’s power under the Fourteenth Amendment and held that the Religious Freedom Restoration Act could not be applied to the states.
  • A. Van Orden v. Perry
    Van Orden v. Perry is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of a Ten Commandments monument on Texas State Capitol grounds against an Establishment Clause challenge.
  • B. Lynch v. Donnelly
    Lynch v. Donnelly is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the inclusion of a nativity scene in a city’s Christmas display and helped shape modern Establishment Clause analysis of government endorsement of religion.
  • C. DeBoer v. Snyder
    DeBoer v. Snyder was a federal court case challenging Michigan’s same-sex marriage ban that became one of the key cases consolidated into the landmark Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
  • D. South Dakota v. Dole
    South Dakota v. Dole is a 1987 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld Congress’s power to condition federal highway funds on states adopting a minimum drinking age of 21, helping define the scope of the federal spending power.
  • E. Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah
    Church of the Lukumi Babalu Aye v. City of Hialeah is a 1993 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down city ordinances targeting Santería animal sacrifice and clarified that laws burdening religious practice must be neutral and generally applicable under the Free Exercise Clause.
  • F. None of above. chosen
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: limitedByCourtCase
Context triple: [Religious Freedom Restoration Act, limitedByCourtCase, City of Boerne v. Flores]
  • A. usedCourt
    Indicates that an entity made use of or participated in legal proceedings within a particular court.
  • B. positionOnLimitationsPeriod
    Indicates the status or effect of a limitations period (such as a statute of limitations) as it applies to a particular claim, action, or situation.
  • C. legalCase
    Indicates a relationship where a formal legal dispute or proceeding exists between parties, typically adjudicated by a court or similar authority.
  • D. cannotHearCasesFrom
    Indicates that one entity lacks the authority or ability to hear, consider, or adjudicate cases originating from another entity.
  • E. hasJurisdictionOver
    Indicates that one authority or governing body holds legal power or control to make and enforce decisions over another entity, area, or matter.
  • F. None of above. chosen

Provenance (7 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a257c4bf688190a46ebbf411ab7473 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 2:49 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a25d5331b48190b3797fece8e60e20 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:13 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69a3b06e75408190987d3dffed703e2e completed March 1, 2026, 3:20 a.m.
NEDg Description generation batch_69a3b0d63cd081908a8e1ce6e24b7a8f completed March 1, 2026, 3:21 a.m.
NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) batch_69a3b13a9cdc81908b2f125f8ddede8f completed March 1, 2026, 3:23 a.m.
PD Predicate disambiguation batch_69a25b678d6c81909780e1995c1ca691 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:05 a.m.
PDg Predicate description generation batch_69a25c2ca46c81908c61696f31e59a98 completed Feb. 28, 2026, 3:08 a.m.
Created at: Feb. 28, 2026, 2:54 a.m.