National League of Cities v. Usery
E15483
National League of Cities v. Usery was a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that temporarily limited Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause by holding that federal wage and hour regulations could not be applied to traditional state government functions.
All labels observed (3)
How this entity was disambiguated
This entity first appeared as the object of triple T125902 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.
Target entity: National League of Cities v. Usery Context triple: [Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, keyCase, National League of Cities v. Usery]
-
A.
United States v. Darby
United States v. Darby is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal labor regulations under the Commerce Clause and marked a broad expansion of federal power over economic activity.
-
B.
Katzenbach v. McClung
Katzenbach v. McClung is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal government’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in local restaurants under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
-
C.
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously ruled that Philadelphia violated a Catholic foster care agency’s religious freedom by excluding it from the foster program over its refusal to certify same-sex couples.
-
D.
Employment Division v. Smith
Employment Division v. Smith is a landmark 1990 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed protections for religious practices under the Free Exercise Clause by upholding the enforcement of neutral, generally applicable laws even when they incidentally burden religion.
-
E.
NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.
NLRB v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp. is a landmark 1937 U.S. Supreme Court decision that upheld federal power to regulate labor relations, marking a major expansion of Congress’s authority over interstate commerce.
- F. None of above. chosen
- G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
Target entity: National League of Cities v. Usery Target entity description: National League of Cities v. Usery was a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that temporarily limited Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause by holding that federal wage and hour regulations could not be applied to traditional state government functions.
-
A.
United States v. Darby
United States v. Darby is a 1941 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal labor regulations under the Commerce Clause and marked a broad expansion of federal power over economic activity.
-
B.
Katzenbach v. McClung
Katzenbach v. McClung is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the federal government’s power to prohibit racial discrimination in local restaurants under the Civil Rights Act of 1964.
-
C.
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia
Fulton v. City of Philadelphia is a 2021 U.S. Supreme Court case in which the Court unanimously ruled that Philadelphia violated a Catholic foster care agency’s religious freedom by excluding it from the foster program over its refusal to certify same-sex couples.
-
D.
Employment Division v. Smith
Employment Division v. Smith is a landmark 1990 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed protections for religious practices under the Free Exercise Clause by upholding the enforcement of neutral, generally applicable laws even when they incidentally burden religion.
-
E.
United Building & Construction Trades Council v. Mayor and Council of Camden
United Building & Construction Trades Council v. Mayor and Council of Camden is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a city’s local-hiring ordinance could be challenged under the Privileges and Immunities Clause for discriminating against out-of-state workers.
- F. None of above. chosen
Statements (48)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
federal court case ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
constitutional law
ⓘ
federalism ⓘ labor and employment law ⓘ |
| arguedDate | March 2, 1976 ⓘ |
| citation | 426 U.S. 833 ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvisionInterpreted |
Commerce Clause
ⓘ
surface form:
Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution
Tenth Amendment to the United States Constitution ⓘ |
| country |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionDate | June 24, 1976 ⓘ |
| decisionType | 5–4 decision ⓘ |
| dissentingOpinionBy |
Harry A. Blackmun
ⓘ
John Paul Stevens ⓘ Thurgood Marshall ⓘ William J. Brennan Jr. ⓘ |
| distinguishedFrom | Maryland v. Wirtz ⓘ |
| doctrine | traditional governmental functions test ⓘ |
| followedBy | Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority ⓘ |
| fullName |
National League of Cities v. Usery
self-linksurface differs
ⓘ
surface form:
National League of Cities et al. v. Usery, Secretary of Labor, et al.
|
| holding |
Congress may not, under the Commerce Clause, directly displace the States’ freedom to structure integral operations in areas of traditional governmental functions
ⓘ
minimum wage and maximum hour provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act could not constitutionally be applied to certain state employees performing traditional governmental functions ⓘ |
| impact | temporarily restricted Congress’s ability to impose wage and hour regulations on state and local governments ⓘ |
| joinedByInMajority |
Byron R. White
ⓘ
Lewis F. Powell Jr. ⓘ Potter Stewart ⓘ Warren E. Burger ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | federal question jurisdiction ⓘ |
| languageOfOpinion | English ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
Tenth Amendment limits on federal power
ⓘ
application of Fair Labor Standards Act to state and local governments ⓘ scope of Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy | William H. Rehnquist ⓘ |
| overruledBy | Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority ⓘ |
| overruledByCitation | 469 U.S. 528 ⓘ |
| overruledByYear | 1985 ⓘ |
| page | 833 ⓘ |
| petitioner | National League of Cities ⓘ |
| precedentFor | temporary limitation on federal regulation of state governmental functions ⓘ |
| relatedCase | Maryland v. Wirtz ⓘ |
| reporter | United States Reports ⓘ |
| respondent | William J. Usery Jr. ⓘ |
| respondentOffice | United States Secretary of Labor ⓘ |
| statuteInterpreted |
Fair Labor Standards Act
ⓘ
surface form:
Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938
|
| subsequentStatus | expressly overruled and no longer controlling precedent on the Tenth Amendment limits announced in the case ⓘ |
| volume | 426 ⓘ |
| year | 1976 ⓘ |
How these facts were elicited
The pipeline generated the facts above by prompting gpt-5.1 with this entity's name + description and the instruction below.
You are a knowledge base construction expert. Given a subject entity and a description of it, return factual statements that you know for the subject as a JSON list of dictionaries(triples), where keys must be "subject", "predicate" and "object". The number of facts may be very high, between 25 to 50 or more, for very popular subjects. For less popular subjects, the number of facts can be very low, like 5 or 10. # Requirements - If you don't know the subject at all, return an empty list. - If the subject is not a named entity, return an empty list. - Include at least one triple where predicate is "instanceOf". - Do not get too wordy. - Separate several objects into multiple triples with one object.
Subject: National League of Cities v. Usery Description of subject: National League of Cities v. Usery was a 1976 U.S. Supreme Court case that temporarily limited Congress’s power under the Commerce Clause by holding that federal wage and hour regulations could not be applied to traditional state government functions.
Referenced by (6)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.