subsequentHistory

P8830 predicate

Indicates that one event, state, or record occurs or is recorded after another in time, reflecting its later historical development or outcome.

Aliases (2)
  • subsequentEvent ×2
  • subsequentStatus ×1

Sample triples (15)
Subject Object
Baker v. Nelson treated as no longer controlling after doctrinal developments culminating in Obergefell v. Hodges
Battle of Resaca de la Palma U.S. advance to and occupation of Matamoros ("subsequentEvent")
Bobby Thomson's "Shot Heard 'Round the World" New York Giants advance to 1951 World Series ("subsequentEvent")
Colorado Department of State v. Baca Tenth Circuit judgment effectively superseded by the Supreme Court’s decision in Chiafalo v. Washington
Colorado Department of State v. Baca certiorari granted sub nom. Colorado Department of State v. Baca and consolidated into Chiafalo v. Washington at the U.S. Supreme Court
Doe v. Bolton limited and effectively overruled in part by Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin On remand, the Fifth Circuit again upheld the University of Texas at Austin’s admissions policy.
Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin The Supreme Court later affirmed the University of Texas at Austin’s policy in Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2016).
INS v. Chadha decision has been repeatedly cited as precedent on separation of powers and legislative veto issues
Lochner v. New York limited and repudiated by later Supreme Court decisions
Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission influenced later litigation over conflicts between religious objections and LGBT anti-discrimination laws
National League of Cities v. Usery expressly overruled and no longer controlling precedent on the Tenth Amendment limits announced in the case ("subsequentStatus")
Shaw v. Reno case remanded for further proceedings consistent with the opinion
State v. Cantwell, 126 Conn. 1, 8 A.2d 533 (1939) reviewed in Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296 (1940)
Wolf v. Colorado Overruled on the exclusionary rule issue by Mapp v. Ohio in 1961

Please wait…