Triple

T4396624
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Corrigan v. Buckley E99506 entity
Predicate laterLimitedBy P8832 FINISHED
Object Hurd v. Hodge E435960 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Hurd v. Hodge | Statement: [Corrigan v. Buckley, laterLimitedBy, Hurd v. Hodge]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target entity: Hurd v. Hodge
Context triple: [Corrigan v. Buckley, laterLimitedBy, Hurd v. Hodge]
  • A. Hurd v. Hodge chosen
    Hurd v. Hodge is a 1948 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racially restrictive covenants in property deeds could not be judicially enforced in the District of Columbia because such enforcement would violate the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.
  • B. Henry v. Hodges
    Henry v. Hodges is a federal court case challenging state bans on same-sex marriage, decided alongside other landmark marriage equality cases prior to Obergefell v. Hodges.
  • C. Briggs v. Elliott
    Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
  • D. Shaw v. Hunt
    Shaw v. Hunt is a 1996 U.S. Supreme Court case that further developed the Court’s racial gerrymandering jurisprudence by applying and extending the principles first articulated in Shaw v. Reno.
  • E. Argersinger v. Hamlin
    Argersinger v. Hamlin is a 1972 U.S. Supreme Court case that extended the right to counsel to defendants in misdemeanor cases that may result in imprisonment.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69b345506b408190b0e3dee616738a7d completed March 12, 2026, 10:59 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69b352aca86c8190b5af7e6600072066 completed March 12, 2026, 11:56 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b6135ecdc08190b2a7458614cf4c54 completed March 15, 2026, 2:03 a.m.
Created at: March 12, 2026, 11:20 p.m.