Triple

T16101734
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College E390635 entity
Predicate limitedPrecedent P8832 FINISHED
Object Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin E32808 NE FINISHED

Named-entity recognition

Before disambiguation, gpt-5-mini classified whether the object phrase is a named entity — the step behind the object's NE type shown above.

Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin | Statement: [Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, limitedPrecedent, Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin]

Disambiguation candidates (1 decision)

The exact options the model was shown at each disambiguation step, with the option it chose highlighted — the evidence behind this triple's disambiguated ids.

NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
Context triple: [Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College, limitedPrecedent, Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin]
  • A. Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin chosen
    Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of race-conscious admissions policies at public universities under the Equal Protection Clause.
  • B. Gratz v. Bollinger
    Gratz v. Bollinger is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the University of Michigan’s undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause by awarding automatic points based on race.
  • C. Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
    Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College is a landmark 2023 U.S. Supreme Court case that sharply limited the use of race-conscious admissions policies in higher education, effectively ending affirmative action programs at colleges and universities nationwide.
  • D. Grutter v. Bollinger
    Grutter v. Bollinger is a landmark 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the limited use of race as one factor in holistic law school admissions to promote educational diversity.
  • E. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
    Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down rigid racial quotas in university admissions while upholding the constitutionality of using race as one factor among many to foster diversity.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

Stage Batch ID Job type Status
creating batch_69d87f198bc48190a8b7e53ca15b7ead elicitation completed
NER batch_69e21a00f6808190a60939ef7ce727a7 ner completed
NED1 batch_69ffeba007c08190bf4d3cf092abc7dd ned_source_triple completed
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5 a.m.