Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Shelby County v. Holder (2013) | Statement: [Voting Rights Act of 1965, affectedByCourtDecision, Shelby County v. Holder (2013)]

Target entity: Shelby County v. Holder (2013)
Context triple: [Voting Rights Act of 1965, affectedByCourtDecision, Shelby County v. Holder (2013)]

• A. Shelby County v. Holder chosen
  Shelby County v. Holder is a 2013 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly weakened the Voting Rights Act of 1965 by striking down the formula used to determine which jurisdictions required federal preclearance for changes to their voting laws.
• B. Gregg v. Georgia
  Gregg v. Georgia is a landmark 1976 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reinstated the death penalty under revised statutes, holding that capital punishment is constitutional under certain guided-discretion procedures.
• C. Alabama v. Shelton
  Alabama v. Shelton is a 2002 U.S. Supreme Court case that held a suspended sentence that may result in imprisonment cannot be imposed unless the defendant was afforded the right to counsel.
• D. DeBoer v. Snyder
  DeBoer v. Snyder was a federal court case challenging Michigan’s same-sex marriage ban that became one of the key cases consolidated into the landmark Supreme Court decision in Obergefell v. Hodges, which legalized same-sex marriage nationwide.
• E. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission
  Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission is a landmark 2010 U.S. Supreme Court case that dramatically expanded the political spending rights of corporations and unions by treating such expenditures as protected speech.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: affectedByCourtDecision
Context triple: [Voting Rights Act of 1965, affectedByCourtDecision, Shelby County v. Holder (2013)]

• A. influencedCourtDecision
  Indicates that one entity had an effect on or contributed to the outcome of a court’s decision regarding another entity or matter.
• B. associatedWithDecision
  Indicates a relationship where an entity is linked or connected to a particular decision, such that the decision is relevant to, influenced by, or otherwise tied to that entity.
• C. wasOverturnedByCourt
  Indicates that a prior decision, ruling, or judgment was reversed or nullified by a court.
• D. limitedByCourtCase chosen
  Indicates that one entity’s scope, effect, or applicability is restricted or constrained as a result of a specific court case or legal proceeding.
• E. legalOutcome
  Indicates the resulting legal status, decision, or consequence that follows from a legal process, action, or judgment.
• F. None of above.