Triple

T6149565
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Massive Resistance strategy against school desegregation E137162 entity
Predicate limitedByDecision P8832 FINISHED
Object Cooper v. Aaron E32807 NE FINISHED

Disambiguation candidates (2 decisions)

The exact options the model was shown at each disambiguation step, with the option it chose highlighted — the evidence behind this triple's disambiguated ids.

NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Cooper v. Aaron
Context triple: [Massive Resistance strategy against school desegregation, limitedByDecision, Cooper v. Aaron]
  • A. Cooper v. Aaron chosen
    Cooper v. Aaron is a landmark 1958 U.S. Supreme Court decision affirming the supremacy of federal law and the Court’s authority by ruling that states are bound to enforce desegregation under Brown v. Board of Education.
  • B. Cooley v. Board of Wardens
    Cooley v. Board of Wardens is an 1852 U.S. Supreme Court decision that helped define the scope of the Commerce Clause by allowing states to regulate certain local aspects of commerce, such as port pilotage, without violating federal authority.
  • C. Ray v. Blair
    Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.
  • D. Briggs v. Elliott
    Briggs v. Elliott was a landmark federal court case from South Carolina challenging racial segregation in public schools, and it became one of the key cases consolidated into Brown v. Board of Education.
  • E. Collin v. Smith
    Collin v. Smith is a U.S. federal court case that addressed the constitutionality of local ordinances restricting a planned Nazi march in Skokie, Illinois, ultimately affirming strong First Amendment protections for offensive political speech.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.
PD Predicate disambiguation gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target predicate: limitedByDecision
Context triple: [Massive Resistance strategy against school desegregation, limitedByDecision, Cooper v. Aaron]
  • A. limitedByCourtCase chosen
    Indicates that one entity’s scope, effect, or applicability is restricted or constrained as a result of a specific court case or legal proceeding.
  • B. decisionsSubjectTo
    Indicates that certain decisions are constrained by, dependent on, or must comply with specified conditions, approvals, or oversight.
  • C. decidedIn
    Indicates that a decision, ruling, or outcome was made within a particular case, proceeding, or deliberative context.
  • D. decidedWith
    Indicates that an entity made a decision jointly or in agreement with another entity.
  • E. decidesOn
    Indicates that an agent makes a choice or determination regarding a particular option, issue, or course of action.
  • F. None of above.

Provenance (4 batches)

Stage Batch ID Job type Status
creating batch_69c008a2c6308190a56519b22d55d083 elicitation completed
NER batch_69c05ce21820819096be9159d6b70a5f ner completed
NED1 batch_69c13608944481909e22df6131a06e41 ned_source_triple completed
PD batch_69c055f39e0881909ae56444b1b48929 pd completed
Created at: March 22, 2026, 4:16 p.m.