Stenberg v. Carhart

E167746

Stenberg v. Carhart is a 2000 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a Nebraska law banning so-called “partial-birth abortion” as unconstitutional for lacking a health exception for the mother and imposing an undue burden on abortion access.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Stenberg v. Carhart canonical 2

Statements (46)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
landmark abortion rights case
areaOfLaw constitutional law
reproductive rights law
challengedLaw Nebraska partial-birth abortion ban statute
citation 530 U.S. 914
concernsProcedure so-called partial-birth abortion
constitutionalProvision Fourteenth Amendment
surface form: Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
country United States of America
surface form: United States
decidedBy Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 2000-06-28
decisionType majority opinion with multiple dissents
dissentBy Anthony M. Kennedy
Antonin Scalia
Clarence Thomas
William H. Rehnquist
docketNumber 99-830
effect invalidated Nebraska’s partial-birth abortion ban
limited states’ ability to ban certain abortion procedures without health exceptions
finding statute was vague and could cover more than one abortion method
hasJurisdiction United States of America
surface form: United States
holding Abortion regulations must include a health exception for the mother
Nebraska law imposed an undue burden on a woman’s right to choose abortion
Nebraska statute banning partial-birth abortion is unconstitutional
impact reinforced requirement that abortion bans include a maternal health exception
joinedMajority David H. Souter
John Paul Stevens
Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Sandra Day O’Connor
language English
laterLimitedBy Gonzales v. Carhart
legalIssue constitutionality of partial-birth abortion ban
requirement of health exception for the mother
undue burden on abortion access
majorityOpinionBy Stephen G. Breyer
originatedIn Nebraska
petitioner Don Stenberg
proceduralPosture appeal from the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
reliesOnPrecedent Planned Parenthood v. Casey
surface form: Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey

Roe v. Wade
respondent Dr. Leroy Carhart
standardApplied undue burden test from Planned Parenthood v. Casey
topic abortion regulation
health exception in abortion statutes
undue burden standard
voteSplit 5-4

Referenced by (2)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Stephen G. Breyer notableCaseParticipation Stenberg v. Carhart
PBA Ban relatedTo Stenberg v. Carhart