Planned Parenthood v. Casey

E14374

Planned Parenthood v. Casey is a landmark 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reaffirmed the constitutional right to abortion while allowing greater state regulation under the “undue burden” standard.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (5)

Statements (51)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
abortion rights case
landmark decision
areaOfLaw constitutional law
reproductive rights
substantive due process
citation 505 U.S. 833
concurringInPartBy Harry A. Blackmun
John Paul Stevens
constitutionalProvision Due Process Clause
Fourteenth Amendment
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1992-06-29
defined an undue burden exists if a regulation has the purpose or effect of placing a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking a pre-viability abortion
dissentBy Antonin Scalia
Byron R. White
Clarence Thomas
William H. Rehnquist
docketNumber 91-744
91-902
fullName Planned Parenthood v. Casey self-linksurface differs
surface form: Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
held 24-hour waiting period requirement is constitutional
informed consent requirements are largely constitutional
parental consent requirement with judicial bypass is constitutional
reaffirmed the essential holding of Roe v. Wade
recognized a constitutional right to choose to have an abortion before fetal viability
spousal notification requirement for abortion is unconstitutional
states may regulate abortion before viability if regulations do not impose an undue burden
impact became leading precedent on abortion regulation until 2022
shaped abortion jurisprudence through undue burden test
involvedParty Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania
Robert P. Casey
issue constitutionality of Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act provisions
jurisdiction United States of America
surface form: United States
legalStandardCreated undue burden standard
limited trimester framework of Roe v. Wade
majorityOpinionBy Anthony M. Kennedy
David H. Souter
Sandra Day O’Connor
surface form: Sandra Day O'Connor
modified Roe v. Wade
overturnedInPartBy Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
surface form: Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
pluralityOpinionBy Anthony M. Kennedy
David H. Souter
Sandra Day O’Connor
surface form: Sandra Day O'Connor
reaffirmed Roe v. Wade
relatedCase Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
surface form: Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization

Roe v. Wade
replaced Roe v. Wade trimester framework with viability-based framework
Robert P. CaseyRole Governor of Pennsylvania
stateOfOrigin Pennsylvania
term 1991 Term

Referenced by (28)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Roe v. Wade hasRelatedCase Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Roe v. Wade influencedCase Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Due Process Clause interpretedInCase Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Planned Parenthood v. Casey fullName Planned Parenthood v. Casey self-linksurface differs
this entity surface form: Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
Mississippi Gestational Age Act relatedTo Planned Parenthood v. Casey
William H. Rehnquist notableCaseParticipation Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Antonin Scalia notableDissent Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Clarence Thomas notableCaseInvolvement Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Anthony M. Kennedy notableCaseOpinion Planned Parenthood v. Casey
David H. Souter notableCase Planned Parenthood v. Casey
91-902 refersTo Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania subjectOf Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Jackson Women’s Health Organization associatedWith Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Robert P. Casey describedBySource Planned Parenthood v. Casey
this entity surface form: Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) U.S. Supreme Court decision
Rehnquist Court landmarkDecision Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Harry A. Blackmun notableWork Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Harry A. Blackmun notableOpinion Planned Parenthood v. Casey
this entity surface form: Planned Parenthood v. Casey, 505 U.S. 833 (1992)
Whole Woman’s Health v. Hellerstedt precedentReliedOn Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Stenberg v. Carhart reliesOnPrecedent Planned Parenthood v. Casey
this entity surface form: Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
United States Supreme Court cases hasPart Planned Parenthood v. Casey
Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health relatedCase Planned Parenthood v. Casey
this entity surface form: Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982 legalChallenge Planned Parenthood v. Casey
this entity surface form: Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982 reviewedInCase Planned Parenthood v. Casey
this entity surface form: Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982 keyIssueIn Planned Parenthood v. Casey
this entity surface form: Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982 relatedToDecision Planned Parenthood v. Casey
this entity surface form: Planned Parenthood v. Casey reaffirmed the core holding of Roe v. Wade
Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982 partiallyUpheldIn Planned Parenthood v. Casey
this entity surface form: Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act of 1982 partiallyInvalidatedIn Planned Parenthood v. Casey
this entity surface form: Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey