Planned Parenthood v. Casey
E14374
Planned Parenthood v. Casey is a landmark 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that reaffirmed the constitutional right to abortion while allowing greater state regulation under the “undue burden” standard.
Aliases (2)
Statements (51)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
→
abortion rights case → landmark decision → |
| areaOfLaw |
constitutional law
→
reproductive rights → substantive due process → |
| citation |
505 U.S. 833
→
|
| concurringInPartBy |
Harry A. Blackmun
→
John Paul Stevens → |
| constitutionalProvision |
Due Process Clause
→
Fourteenth Amendment → |
| court |
Supreme Court of the United States
→
|
| decisionDate |
1992-06-29
→
|
| defined |
an undue burden exists if a regulation has the purpose or effect of placing a substantial obstacle in the path of a woman seeking a pre-viability abortion
→
|
| dissentBy |
Antonin Scalia
→
Byron R. White → Clarence Thomas → William H. Rehnquist → |
| docketNumber |
91-744
→
91-902 → |
| fullName |
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey
→
|
| held |
24-hour waiting period requirement is constitutional
→
informed consent requirements are largely constitutional → parental consent requirement with judicial bypass is constitutional → reaffirmed the essential holding of Roe v. Wade → recognized a constitutional right to choose to have an abortion before fetal viability → spousal notification requirement for abortion is unconstitutional → states may regulate abortion before viability if regulations do not impose an undue burden → |
| impact |
became leading precedent on abortion regulation until 2022
→
shaped abortion jurisprudence through undue burden test → |
| involvedParty |
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania
→
Robert P. Casey → |
| issue |
constitutionality of Pennsylvania Abortion Control Act provisions
→
|
| jurisdiction |
United States
→
|
| legalStandardCreated |
undue burden standard
→
|
| limited |
trimester framework of Roe v. Wade
→
|
| majorityOpinionBy |
Anthony M. Kennedy
→
David H. Souter → Sandra Day O'Connor → |
| modified |
Roe v. Wade
→
|
| overturnedInPartBy |
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
→
|
| pluralityOpinionBy |
Anthony M. Kennedy
→
David H. Souter → Sandra Day O'Connor → |
| reaffirmed |
Roe v. Wade
→
|
| relatedCase |
Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization
→
Roe v. Wade → |
| replaced |
Roe v. Wade trimester framework with viability-based framework
→
|
| Robert P. CaseyRole |
Governor of Pennsylvania
→
|
| stateOfOrigin |
Pennsylvania
→
|
| term |
1991 Term
→
|
Referenced by (15)
| Subject (surface form when different) | Predicate |
|---|---|
|
Jackson Women’s Health Organization
→
|
associatedWith |
|
Robert P. Casey
("Planned Parenthood v. Casey (1992) U.S. Supreme Court decision")
→
|
describedBySource |
|
Planned Parenthood v. Casey
("Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania v. Casey")
→
|
fullName |
|
Roe v. Wade
→
|
hasRelatedCase |
|
Roe v. Wade
→
|
influencedCase |
|
Due Process Clause
→
|
interpretedInCase |
|
David H. Souter
→
|
notableCase |
|
Clarence Thomas
→
|
notableCaseInvolvement |
|
Anthony M. Kennedy
→
|
notableCaseOpinion |
|
William H. Rehnquist
→
|
notableCaseParticipation |
|
Antonin Scalia
→
|
notableDissent |
|
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization
→
|
overruledCase |
|
91-902
→
|
refersTo |
|
Mississippi Gestational Age Act
→
|
relatedTo |
|
Planned Parenthood of Southeastern Pennsylvania
→
|
subjectOf |