voteSplit

P4305
predicate

Indicates that a voting outcome is divided among multiple options or parties rather than being unanimous or clearly majority.

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
voteSplit canonical 50

Sample triples (50)

Subject Object
Steward Machine Co. v. Davis 5–4
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization 6–3 on upholding the Mississippi law
Dobbs v. Jackson Women’s Health Organization 5–4 on overruling Roe and Casey
San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez 5–4
Smith v. Allwright 8–1
American Insurance Assn. v. Garamendi 5-4
New York v. United States (1992) 6–3
Trump v. Vance 7-2
Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins 6-3 on liability issues
Engel v. Vitale 6–1
Yamashita v. Styer 7–2
Brnovich v. Democratic National Committee 6–3
11-400 5-4 on the individual mandate as a tax
11-400 7-2 on limiting Medicaid expansion enforcement
United Public Workers v. Mitchell 4–3
Reynolds v. Sims decision 8–1
Chisholm v. Georgia 4–1
United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Association 4–3
Shapiro v. Thompson 6-3
Nixon v. Fitzgerald 5-4
Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting 5-3
Carpenter v. United States 5-4
Altitude Express Inc. v. Zarda 6–3
Stenberg v. Carhart 5-4
BE&K Construction Co. v. NLRB 9-0 on the judgment
BE&K Construction Co. v. NLRB divided on reasoning with concurring opinions
Morse v. Frederick 5-4
Janus v. AFSCME 5-4
Ray v. Blair 5–4
Prigg v. Pennsylvania 8–1
Hudson v. McMillian 7-2
Miller v. Alabama 5-4
Supreme Court decision in City of Mobile v. Bolden
surface form: City of Mobile v. Bolden
plurality decision
Screws v. United States plurality with multiple concurrences and dissents
Downes v. Bidwell 5–4
Arizona v. Inter Tribal Council of Arizona, Inc. 7-2
The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act’s provisions prohibiting state authorization of sports gambling schemes violate the anti-commandeering rule of the Tenth Amendment.
surface form: The Professional and Amateur Sports Protection Act’s provisions prohibiting state authorization of sports gambling schemes violate the anti-commandeering rule of the Tenth Amendment
7-2 on anti-commandeering holding
PASPA was struck down as unconstitutional.
surface form: PASPA was struck down as unconstitutional
6-3
The House committees had to satisfy a more demanding standard to enforce subpoenas for the President’s personal financial records.
surface form: Trump v. Mazars USA, LLP
7-2
Gray v. Sanders 8–1
Jackson complained that the girls’ basketball team received unequal resources compared to the boys’ team
surface form: Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education
5-4
Moore v. Texas 5-3
No. 04-108 5-4
Hamdi v. Rumsfeld plurality decision
US Supreme Court case Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker
surface form: Exxon Shipping Co. v. Baker
5-3 on punitive damages ratio rule
Edmonson v. Leesville Concrete Co. 6-3
Cummings v. Missouri 5–4
Prize Cases 5–4
Salinas v. United States 9-0
Allen v. Milligan 5-4