Ray v. Blair

E209913

Ray v. Blair is a 1952 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld a state's authority to require presidential electors to pledge support for their party's nominees as a condition of appointment.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (1)

Label Occurrences
Ray v. Blair canonical 1

Statements (46)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
constitutional law case
election law case
areaOfLaw U.S. constitutional law
U.S. election law
bindingAuthorityIn federal judiciary of the United States
surface form: federal courts of the United States

state courts on questions of federal constitutional law
citation 343 U.S. 214
concerns authority of states over selection of presidential electors
party primary procedures for choosing electors
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Article II of the United States Constitution
Twelfth Amendment to the United States Constitution
country United States of America
surface form: United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1952-04-01
dissentingOpinionBy Felix Frankfurter
surface form: Justice Felix Frankfurter

Hugo L. Black
surface form: Justice Hugo L. Black

Robert H. Jackson
surface form: Justice Robert H. Jackson

William O. Douglas
surface form: Justice William O. Douglas
finding States have broad power to appoint electors and may condition appointment on a pledge
holding A state may require presidential electors to pledge to support their party’s nominees as a condition of appointment
Such a pledge requirement does not violate the U.S. Constitution
Electoral College
surface form: The Twelfth Amendment does not prohibit states from requiring elector pledges
impact Strengthened state and party control over presidential electors
issue Whether a state can require party loyalty pledges from presidential electors
Whether elector pledge requirements violate the Twelfth Amendment
jurisdiction United States of America
surface form: United States
languageOfDecision English
legalSubject Electoral College
political parties
presidential elections
state election law
majorityOpinionBy Justice Stanley Reed
surface form: Justice Stanley Forman Reed
opinionType majority opinion
originatingJurisdiction Alabama
surface form: State of Alabama
pageInUnitedStatesReports 214
petitioner Ray
relatedCase Chiafalo v. Washington
McPherson v. Blacker
relatedConcept faithless electors
party loyalty pledge
respondent Blair
stateActionUpheld Democratic Party of Alabama’s requirement that elector candidates pledge to support the party’s nominees
volumeInUnitedStatesReports 343
voteSplit 5–4
yearDecided 1952

Referenced by (1)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.