Downes v. Bidwell

E388979

Downes v. Bidwell is a 1901 U.S. Supreme Court case that helped establish the "Insular Cases" doctrine, holding that full constitutional rights do not automatically extend to all territories under American control.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (3)

Statements (47)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Insular Case
U.S. Supreme Court case
areaOfLaw U.S. territorial law
constitutional law
citation 182 U.S. 244
concurrenceBy Edward Douglass White
George Shiras Jr.
Horace Gray
Joseph McKenna
constitutionalConcept incorporated vs. unincorporated territories
limited application of certain constitutional provisions outside the states
constitutionalProvisionDiscussed Taxing and Spending Clause
surface form: Taxing and Spending Clause of the U.S. Constitution

Uniformity Clause
surface form: Uniformity Clause of Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution
country United States of America
surface form: United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
dateDecided 1901-05-27
defendant George R. Bidwell
dissentBy David J. Brewer
Henry Brown Fuller
John Marshall Harlan
Rufus W. Peckham
fullCaseName Downes v. Bidwell self-linksurface differs
surface form: Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901)
historicalContext post–Spanish–American War acquisition of overseas territories
holding Congress may treat unincorporated territories differently from states for certain constitutional purposes
duties could be imposed on goods imported from Puerto Rico into the United States
the U.S. Constitution does not fully and automatically apply to all territories under American control
impact contributed to the doctrine that some constitutional rights are not fully applicable in unincorporated territories
helped establish the Insular Cases framework for U.S. territories
influenced later cases on the status of Puerto Rico and other U.S. territories
jurisdiction federal
language English
legalIssue application of the U.S. Constitution to unincorporated territories
status of newly acquired U.S. territories after the Spanish–American War
validity of federal tariffs on goods from U.S. territories
locationArgued Washington, D.C.
majorityOpinionBy Henry Billings Brown
partOf Insular Cases
plaintiff Samuel Downes
precedentFor later Supreme Court decisions on the rights of territorial residents
relatedDoctrine Insular Cases
territorial incorporation doctrine
result tariff on goods from Puerto Rico upheld
subjectMatter federal tariff on oranges imported from Puerto Rico
subsequentCriticism criticized for enabling unequal treatment of residents of U.S. territories
territoryInvolved Puerto Rico
voteSplit 5–4
yearDecided 1901

Referenced by (15)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

insular cases doctrine hasPart Downes v. Bidwell
subject surface form: Insular Cases doctrine
insular cases doctrine hasPart Downes v. Bidwell
subject surface form: Insular Cases doctrine
this entity surface form: De Lima v. Bidwell
United States territorial law shapedBy Downes v. Bidwell
Downes v. Bidwell fullCaseName Downes v. Bidwell self-linksurface differs
this entity surface form: Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901)
Balzac v. Porto Rico relatedCase Downes v. Bidwell
Insular Cases hasPart Downes v. Bidwell
Insular Cases hasPart Downes v. Bidwell
this entity surface form: De Lima v. Bidwell
Insular Cases notableCase Downes v. Bidwell
Dooley v. United States isRelatedCase Downes v. Bidwell
Dooley v. United States isRelatedCase Downes v. Bidwell
this entity surface form: De Lima v. Bidwell
Dorr v. United States relatedCase Downes v. Bidwell
Ocampo v. United States relatedTo Downes v. Bidwell
Rassmussen v. United States relatedTo Downes v. Bidwell