Downes v. Bidwell
E388979
Downes v. Bidwell is a 1901 U.S. Supreme Court case that helped establish the "Insular Cases" doctrine, holding that full constitutional rights do not automatically extend to all territories under American control.
All labels observed (3)
| Label | Occurrences |
|---|---|
| Downes v. Bidwell canonical | 11 |
| De Lima v. Bidwell | 3 |
| Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901) | 1 |
Statements (47)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
Insular Case
ⓘ
U.S. Supreme Court case ⓘ |
| areaOfLaw |
U.S. territorial law
ⓘ
constitutional law ⓘ |
| citation | 182 U.S. 244 ⓘ |
| concurrenceBy |
Edward Douglass White
ⓘ
George Shiras Jr. ⓘ Horace Gray ⓘ Joseph McKenna ⓘ |
| constitutionalConcept |
incorporated vs. unincorporated territories
ⓘ
limited application of certain constitutional provisions outside the states ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvisionDiscussed |
Taxing and Spending Clause
ⓘ
surface form:
Taxing and Spending Clause of the U.S. Constitution
Uniformity Clause ⓘ
surface form:
Uniformity Clause of Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution
|
| country |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| dateDecided | 1901-05-27 ⓘ |
| defendant | George R. Bidwell ⓘ |
| dissentBy |
David J. Brewer
ⓘ
Henry Brown Fuller ⓘ John Marshall Harlan ⓘ Rufus W. Peckham ⓘ |
| fullCaseName |
Downes v. Bidwell
self-linksurface differs
ⓘ
surface form:
Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901)
|
| historicalContext | post–Spanish–American War acquisition of overseas territories ⓘ |
| holding |
Congress may treat unincorporated territories differently from states for certain constitutional purposes
ⓘ
duties could be imposed on goods imported from Puerto Rico into the United States ⓘ the U.S. Constitution does not fully and automatically apply to all territories under American control ⓘ |
| impact |
contributed to the doctrine that some constitutional rights are not fully applicable in unincorporated territories
ⓘ
helped establish the Insular Cases framework for U.S. territories ⓘ influenced later cases on the status of Puerto Rico and other U.S. territories ⓘ |
| jurisdiction | federal ⓘ |
| language | English ⓘ |
| legalIssue |
application of the U.S. Constitution to unincorporated territories
ⓘ
status of newly acquired U.S. territories after the Spanish–American War ⓘ validity of federal tariffs on goods from U.S. territories ⓘ |
| locationArgued | Washington, D.C. ⓘ |
| majorityOpinionBy | Henry Billings Brown ⓘ |
| partOf | Insular Cases ⓘ |
| plaintiff | Samuel Downes ⓘ |
| precedentFor | later Supreme Court decisions on the rights of territorial residents ⓘ |
| relatedDoctrine |
Insular Cases
ⓘ
territorial incorporation doctrine ⓘ |
| result | tariff on goods from Puerto Rico upheld ⓘ |
| subjectMatter | federal tariff on oranges imported from Puerto Rico ⓘ |
| subsequentCriticism | criticized for enabling unequal treatment of residents of U.S. territories ⓘ |
| territoryInvolved | Puerto Rico ⓘ |
| voteSplit | 5–4 ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 1901 ⓘ |
Referenced by (15)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
subject surface form:
Insular Cases doctrine
subject surface form:
Insular Cases doctrine
this entity surface form:
De Lima v. Bidwell
this entity surface form:
Downes v. Bidwell, 182 U.S. 244 (1901)
this entity surface form:
De Lima v. Bidwell
this entity surface form:
De Lima v. Bidwell