Triple

T7475612
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Abigail Noel Fisher E176624 entity
Predicate legalCase P3996 FINISHED
Object Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin E32808 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin | Statement: [Abigail Noel Fisher, legalCase, Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
Context triple: [Abigail Noel Fisher, legalCase, Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin]
  • A. Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin chosen
    Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of race-conscious admissions policies at public universities under the Equal Protection Clause.
  • B. Gratz v. Bollinger
    Gratz v. Bollinger is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the University of Michigan’s undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause by awarding automatic points based on race.
  • C. Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
    Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College is a landmark 2023 U.S. Supreme Court case that sharply limited the use of race-conscious admissions policies in higher education, effectively ending affirmative action programs at colleges and universities nationwide.
  • D. Grutter v. Bollinger
    Grutter v. Bollinger is a landmark 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the limited use of race as one factor in holistic law school admissions to promote educational diversity.
  • E. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
    Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down rigid racial quotas in university admissions while upholding the constitutionality of using race as one factor among many to foster diversity.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69c69f236ce08190a04d7679f03b29b2 completed March 27, 2026, 3:15 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69c6f41951348190a740b3957a73f825 completed March 27, 2026, 9:18 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69c8682f438c8190bca55f7773fe6838 completed March 28, 2026, 11:45 p.m.
Created at: March 27, 2026, 3:41 p.m.