Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin | Statement: [Grutter v. Bollinger, subsequentLimitationBy, Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin]

Target entity: Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
Context triple: [Grutter v. Bollinger, subsequentLimitationBy, Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin]

• A. Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin chosen
  Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of race-conscious admissions policies at public universities under the Equal Protection Clause.
• B. Gratz v. Bollinger
  Gratz v. Bollinger is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the University of Michigan’s undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause by awarding automatic points based on race.
• C. Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
  Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College is a landmark 2023 U.S. Supreme Court case that sharply limited the use of race-conscious admissions policies in higher education, effectively ending affirmative action programs at colleges and universities nationwide.
• D. Grutter v. Bollinger
  Grutter v. Bollinger is a landmark 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the limited use of race as one factor in holistic law school admissions to promote educational diversity.
• E. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
  Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down rigid racial quotas in university admissions while upholding the constitutionality of using race as one factor among many to foster diversity.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: subsequentLimitationBy
Context triple: [Grutter v. Bollinger, subsequentLimitationBy, Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin]

• A. hasLimitation
  Indicates that an entity is subject to a constraint, restriction, or boundary that limits its scope, capability, or applicability.
• B. isLimitOf
  Indicates that one quantity, function, or sequence approaches a particular value as its input or index approaches some specified point or condition.
• C. showsLimitationOf chosen
  Indicates that one entity reveals, demonstrates, or makes apparent the limitations, weaknesses, or constraints of another entity.
• D. gLimit
  Indicates a constraint or maximum boundary imposed on the magnitude, rate, or extent of something within a given context.
• E. subsequentUse
  Indicates that one entity is used, applied, or consumed after another entity in time or sequence.
• F. None of above.