Triple

T752844
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Regents of the University of California v. Bakke E15486 entity
Predicate subsequentCaseInfluenced P12604 FINISHED
Object Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin E32808 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin | Statement: [Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, subsequentCaseInfluenced, Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
Context triple: [Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, subsequentCaseInfluenced, Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin]
  • A. Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin chosen
    Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of race-conscious admissions policies at public universities under the Equal Protection Clause.
  • B. Gratz v. Bollinger
    Gratz v. Bollinger is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the University of Michigan’s undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause by awarding automatic points based on race.
  • C. Grutter v. Bollinger
    Grutter v. Bollinger is a landmark 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the limited use of race as one factor in holistic law school admissions to promote educational diversity.
  • D. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
    Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down rigid racial quotas in university admissions while upholding the constitutionality of using race as one factor among many to foster diversity.
  • E. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents
    McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents is a 1950 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down racial segregation within a public university’s graduate program, marking an important step toward the desegregation of higher education.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a493599a0081908da65f3407af1ef2 completed March 1, 2026, 7:28 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a4aa9ba3888190889a1ad554f73c5e completed March 1, 2026, 9:07 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69a7a3aacc788190b79623c86b2a5fe7 completed March 4, 2026, 3:14 a.m.
Created at: March 1, 2026, 7:37 p.m.