Triple

T1538477
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin E32808 entity
Predicate relatedCase P3137 FINISHED
Object Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2016) E32808 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2016) | Statement: [Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, relatedCase, Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2016)]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2016)
Context triple: [Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin, relatedCase, Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin (2016)]
  • A. Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin chosen
    Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of race-conscious admissions policies at public universities under the Equal Protection Clause.
  • B. Gratz v. Bollinger
    Gratz v. Bollinger is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the University of Michigan’s undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause by awarding automatic points based on race.
  • C. Grutter v. Bollinger
    Grutter v. Bollinger is a landmark 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the limited use of race as one factor in holistic law school admissions to promote educational diversity.
  • D. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
    Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down rigid racial quotas in university admissions while upholding the constitutionality of using race as one factor among many to foster diversity.
  • E. Branch v. Texas
    Branch v. Texas is a U.S. Supreme Court case addressing the constitutionality and application of the death penalty in the wake of the landmark Furman v. Georgia decision.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69a885ed29088190a3c2d5a3d100c16e completed March 4, 2026, 7:20 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69a9082c186c81909c5c4c1a8a47c603 completed March 5, 2026, 4:35 a.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69ad3706935481909455528b1bc4ce6c completed March 8, 2026, 8:44 a.m.
Created at: March 4, 2026, 7:26 p.m.