Bolling v. Sharpe

E10748

Bolling v. Sharpe is a 1954 U.S. Supreme Court case that held racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools unconstitutional under the Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause.

Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

Observed surface forms (1)

Surface form Occurrences
Bolling et al. v. Sharpe et al. 1

Statements (47)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
desegregation case
landmark decision
appliesTo federal government
areaOfLaw civil rights law
constitutional law
education law
citation 347 U.S. 497
clauseInterpreted Due Process Clause
surface form: Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment
constitutionalAmendmentNumber 5
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution
constitutionalRightProtected right to due process of law
right to equal treatment in public education
decidedSameDayAs Brown v. Board of Education
decisionDate 1954-05-17
decisionFormat per curiam-like unanimous opinion authored by the Chief Justice
distinguishedFrom Brown v. Board of Education
surface form: Brown v. Board of Education (which applied the Fourteenth Amendment to the states)
doctrineApplied reverse incorporation
establishedPrinciple equal protection principles are applicable to the federal government through the Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause
racial segregation in public education violates the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment
hasCountry United States of America
surface form: United States
hasCourt Supreme Court of the United States
holding racial segregation in District of Columbia public schools is unconstitutional
impact contributed to the dismantling of legally mandated school segregation in the United States
extended constitutional protections against racial segregation to federal jurisdictions
isPartOf Warren Court jurisprudence
jurisdiction District of Columbia
legalIssue constitutionality of school segregation in the District of Columbia
racial segregation in public schools
opinionAuthor Earl Warren
opinionType majority opinion
overturnedPractice racial segregation in Washington, D.C. public schools
pageInUnitedStatesReports 497
petitioner Black schoolchildren in the District of Columbia
reasoning segregation in public education is not reasonably related to any proper governmental objective
segregation in public schools imposes an arbitrary deprivation of liberty in violation of due process
relatedTo Brown v. Board of Education
respondent C. Melvin Sharpe
respondentRole President of the Board of Education of the District of Columbia
segregationBasis race
subjectMatter public education in the District of Columbia
subsequentCitationBy Supreme Court of the United States
surface form: United States Supreme Court
typeOfSegregationChallenged de jure racial segregation
unanimousDecision true
usedFor foundation of reverse incorporation doctrine in later equal protection cases against the federal government
volumeInUnitedStatesReports 347
yearDecided 1954

Referenced by (5)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

subject surface form: Bolling v. Sharpe
this entity surface form: Bolling et al. v. Sharpe et al.
Briggs v. Elliott relatedCase Bolling v. Sharpe
Brown v. Board of Education relatedCase Bolling v. Sharpe
Gebhart v. Belton relatedCase Bolling v. Sharpe