Triple

Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).

Phrase: Grutter v. Bollinger | Statement: [Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, subsequentCaseInfluenced, Grutter v. Bollinger]

Target entity: Grutter v. Bollinger
Context triple: [Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, subsequentCaseInfluenced, Grutter v. Bollinger]

• A. Grutter v. Bollinger chosen
  Grutter v. Bollinger is a landmark 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the limited use of race as one factor in holistic law school admissions to promote educational diversity.
• B. Gratz v. Bollinger
  Gratz v. Bollinger is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the University of Michigan’s undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause by awarding automatic points based on race.
• C. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
  Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down rigid racial quotas in university admissions while upholding the constitutionality of using race as one factor among many to foster diversity.
• D. Lee v. Weisman
  Lee v. Weisman is a 1992 U.S. Supreme Court decision that held clergy-led prayer at public school graduation ceremonies unconstitutional under the Establishment Clause.
• E. Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin
  Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin is a landmark U.S. Supreme Court case that challenged the constitutionality of race-conscious admissions policies at public universities under the Equal Protection Clause.
• F. None of above.
• G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Target predicate: subsequentCaseInfluenced
Context triple: [Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, subsequentCaseInfluenced, Grutter v. Bollinger]

• A. influencedCourtDecision chosen
  Indicates that one entity had an effect on or contributed to the outcome of a court’s decision regarding another entity or matter.
• B. subsequentHistory
  Indicates that one event, state, or record occurs or is recorded after another in time, reflecting its later historical development or outcome.
• C. subsequentCitationIn
  Indicates that one work cites or references another work that appears later in a specified source or sequence.
• D. legalDoctrineInfluenced
  Indicates that one legal doctrine has shaped, informed, or contributed to the development or interpretation of another legal doctrine.
• E. influenced
  Indicates that one entity has affected, shaped, or altered another entity’s state, behavior, or characteristics.
• F. None of above.