Triple

T3830394
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Grutter v. Bollinger E90995 entity
Predicate followedPrecedent P3138 FINISHED
Object Regents of the University of California v. Bakke E15486 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Regents of the University of California v. Bakke | Statement: [Grutter v. Bollinger, followedPrecedent, Regents of the University of California v. Bakke]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
Context triple: [Grutter v. Bollinger, followedPrecedent, Regents of the University of California v. Bakke]
  • A. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke chosen
    Regents of the University of California v. Bakke is a landmark 1978 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down rigid racial quotas in university admissions while upholding the constitutionality of using race as one factor among many to foster diversity.
  • B. Grutter v. Bollinger
    Grutter v. Bollinger is a landmark 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the limited use of race as one factor in holistic law school admissions to promote educational diversity.
  • C. Gratz v. Bollinger
    Gratz v. Bollinger is a 2003 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down the University of Michigan’s undergraduate affirmative action admissions policy as violating the Equal Protection Clause by awarding automatic points based on race.
  • D. McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents
    McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents is a 1950 U.S. Supreme Court case that struck down racial segregation within a public university’s graduate program, marking an important step toward the desegregation of higher education.
  • E. Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College
    Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College is a landmark 2023 U.S. Supreme Court case that sharply limited the use of race-conscious admissions policies in higher education, effectively ending affirmative action programs at colleges and universities nationwide.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69aed960b538819096561c8ed448dec9 completed March 9, 2026, 2:29 p.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69aeeb8459f881908a2c91bb07e381ef completed March 9, 2026, 3:47 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_69b5336ec05c8190ab632671bc1326c2 completed March 14, 2026, 10:07 a.m.
Created at: March 9, 2026, 3:17 p.m.