Equal Protection Clause

E15484

constitutional clause legal doctrine

The Equal Protection Clause is a key constitutional provision that prohibits states from denying any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws, forming the basis for many landmark civil rights decisions in the United States.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Disambiguation Statements Elicitation Referenced by

All labels observed (10)

Label	Occurrences
Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment	43
Equal Protection Clause canonical	40
Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution	11
Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause	8
Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution	3
Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment (legal claim)	1
Fourteenth Amendment equal protection	1
U.S. Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, Equal Protection Clause	1
equal protection clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution	1
the Equal Protection Clause protects minority groups from being disadvantaged in the political process	1

How this entity was disambiguated

This entity first appeared as the object of triple T126032 — resolving that mention is where its identity was fixed. The disambiguator weighed these candidate entities and picked the highlighted one (or “None”, minting a new entity). This is how homonymy is resolved: the same surface form can point to different entities.

NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07

Target entity: Equal Protection Clause
Context triple: [Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, containsClause, Equal Protection Clause]

A. Due Process Clause
The Due Process Clause is a constitutional guarantee in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments that prohibits the government from depriving individuals of life, liberty, or property without fair legal procedures and fundamental fairness.
B. Fourteenth Amendment
The Fourteenth Amendment is a key post–Civil War addition to the U.S. Constitution that guarantees citizenship, due process, and equal protection under the law, forming the foundation of many modern civil rights protections.
C. Privileges and Immunities Clause
The Privileges and Immunities Clause is a constitutional provision that prevents states from discriminating against citizens of other states in fundamental rights such as access to courts, property, and employment.
D. Employment Division v. Smith
Employment Division v. Smith is a landmark 1990 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed protections for religious practices under the Free Exercise Clause by upholding the enforcement of neutral, generally applicable laws even when they incidentally burden religion.
E. Civil Rights Act of 1875
The Civil Rights Act of 1875 was a U.S. federal law enacted during Reconstruction that aimed to guarantee African Americans equal access to public accommodations and jury service, though it was later struck down by the Supreme Court.
F. None of above. chosen
G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

NED2 Entity disambiguation (via description) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07

Target entity: Equal Protection Clause
Target entity description: The Equal Protection Clause is a key constitutional provision that prohibits states from denying any person within their jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws, forming the basis for many landmark civil rights decisions in the United States.

A. Due Process Clause
The Due Process Clause is a constitutional guarantee in the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments that prohibits the government from depriving individuals of life, liberty, or property without fair legal procedures and fundamental fairness.
B. Fourteenth Amendment
The Fourteenth Amendment is a key post–Civil War addition to the U.S. Constitution that guarantees citizenship, due process, and equal protection under the law, forming the foundation of many modern civil rights protections.
C. Privileges and Immunities Clause
The Privileges and Immunities Clause is a constitutional provision that prevents states from discriminating against citizens of other states in fundamental rights such as access to courts, property, and employment.
D. Employment Division v. Smith
Employment Division v. Smith is a landmark 1990 U.S. Supreme Court decision that significantly narrowed protections for religious practices under the Free Exercise Clause by upholding the enforcement of neutral, generally applicable laws even when they incidentally burden religion.
E. Civil Rights Act of 1875
The Civil Rights Act of 1875 was a U.S. federal law enacted during Reconstruction that aimed to guarantee African Americans equal access to public accommodations and jury service, though it was later struck down by the Supreme Court.
F. None of above. chosen

Statements (64)

Predicate	Object
instanceOf	constitutional clause ⓘ legal doctrine ⓘ
adoptedIn	1868 ⓘ
appliesTo	local governments ⓘ persons within state jurisdiction ⓘ state governments ⓘ states ⓘ
basisFor	Brown v. Board of Education ⓘ Bush v. Gore ⓘ Craig v. Boren ⓘ Frontiero v. Richardson ⓘ Gratz v. Bollinger ⓘ Grutter v. Bollinger ⓘ Korematsu v. United States (dissent) ⓘ surface form: Korematsu v. United States (majority and later criticism) Lawrence v. Texas (in part) ⓘ Loving v. Virginia ⓘ Obergefell v. Hodges ⓘ Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1 ⓘ Plyler v. Doe ⓘ Reed v. Reed ⓘ Regents of the University of California v. Bakke ⓘ Roe v. Wade ⓘ surface form: Roe v. Wade (in part) Romer v. Evans ⓘ San Antonio Independent School District v. Rodriguez ⓘ Shaw v. Reno ⓘ Shelley v. Kraemer ⓘ United States v. Virginia (1996) majority opinion ⓘ surface form: United States v. Virginia Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp. ⓘ Washington v. Davis ⓘ Windsor v. United States (in part) ⓘ Yick Wo v. Hopkins ⓘ
country	United States of America ⓘ
doesNotDirectlyApplyTo	private conduct without state involvement ⓘ
draftedAsPartOf	Reconstruction Amendments ⓘ
effectiveDate	July 9, 1868 ⓘ
enforcedBy	Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ federal courts of the United States ⓘ
historicalContext	post–American Civil War Reconstruction era ⓘ
influenced	Civil Rights Movement jurisprudence ⓘ
influencedBy	Civil Rights Act of 1866 ⓘ
interpretedBy	judicial review ⓘ
jurisdiction	United States of America ⓘ surface form: United States
languageType	negative rights provision ⓘ
legalSystem	United States constitutional law ⓘ
locatedInDocument	Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ surface form: Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment
partOf	Fourteenth Amendment ⓘ surface form: Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
protects	children of undocumented immigrants (as in Plyler v. Doe) ⓘ non-citizens within state jurisdiction ⓘ racial minorities ⓘ women ⓘ
purpose	to prohibit states from denying any person the equal protection of the laws ⓘ
relatedConcept	affirmative action ⓘ civil rights ⓘ equal protection ⓘ fundamental rights ⓘ incorporation doctrine ⓘ intermediate scrutiny ⓘ racial segregation ⓘ rational basis review ⓘ same-sex marriage ⓘ strict scrutiny ⓘ suspect classification ⓘ
scope	state action requirement ⓘ
text	"nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws" ⓘ

How these facts were elicited

Referenced by (110)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Shaw v. Reno → legalIssue → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

Washington v. Davis → legalIssue → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Washington v. Davis → constitutionalProvisionInterpreted → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Bakke → subjectMatter → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

McGhee v. Sipes → constitutionalProvisionInvolved → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Corrigan v. Buckley → constitutionalIssue → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Fourteenth Amendment equal protection

McLaurin was required to sit in designated segregated areas in classrooms, the library, and the cafeteria. → issue → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

subject surface form: McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

McLaurin was required to sit in designated segregated areas in classrooms, the library, and the cafeteria. → constitutionalProvision → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

subject surface form: McLaurin v. Oklahoma State Regents

Yick Wo v. Hopkins → legalIssue → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Yick Wo v. Hopkins → constitutionalProvisionInterpreted → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

Sally Reed → legalContext → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Sally Reed → legalSubject → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

subject surface form: Reed v. Reed

Mildred Loving → constitutionalBasis → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Richard Loving → constitutionalIssue → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

Reynolds v. Sims decision → constitutionalProvisionInterpreted → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Reynolds v. Sims decision → constitutionalBasis → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

Shapiro v. Thompson → legalIssue → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Shapiro v. Thompson → constitutionalProvision → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

Slaughter-House Cases → relatedClause → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Baker v. Carr → constitutionalProvision → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Eisenstadt v. Baird → legalIssue → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

Love v. Beshear → constitutionalBasis → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

CRIPA → relatedTo → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

subject surface form: Civil Rights of Institutionalized Persons Act

Cecil Reed → legalIssueInvolved → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Fisher I → legalIssue → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Fisher I → constitutionalProvision → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education → legalIssue → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education → constitutionalProvision → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

Milliken I → constitutionalProvisionInterpreted → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

subject surface form: Milliken v. Bradley (1974)

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Ronald H. Bradley et al. → constitutionalBasisInvoked → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

Green v. County School Board of New Kent County → legalIssue → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

Thomas Kostura → assertedViolationOf → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Carolyn Whitener → legalIssueInvolved → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Title I → constitutionalBasis → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

subject surface form: Title I of the Civil Rights Act of 1964

Curtis Craig → legalIssueInvolved → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Fern Kraemer → relatedToTopic → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action (dissent on affirmative action) → legalIssue → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Schuette v. Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action (dissent on affirmative action) → argues → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: the Equal Protection Clause protects minority groups from being disadvantaged in the political process

Batson v. Kentucky → constitutionalProvisionInterpreted → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

John Doe → concerns → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

subject surface form: Plyler v. Doe

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Texas Education Code §21.031 → constitutionalIssue → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

McCleskey v. Kemp → legalIssue → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause

Griffin v. County School Board of Prince Edward County → legalIssue → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Griffin v. County School Board of Prince Edward County → constitutionalProvisionInterpreted → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

Nixon v. Herndon → constitutionalProvisionInterpreted → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

Skinner v. Oklahoma → constitutionalProvisionInterpreted → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Railway Express Agency v. New York → legalIssue → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Railway Express Agency v. New York → constitutionalProvisionInterpreted → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: U.S. Constitution, Fourteenth Amendment, Equal Protection Clause

Students for Fair Admissions v. President and Fellows of Harvard College → constitutionalProvisionInterpreted → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution

Colorado Amendment 2 → constitutionalIssue → Equal Protection Clause ⓘ

this entity surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution

All labels observed (10)

How this entity was disambiguated Show

Statements (64)

How these facts were elicited Show

Referenced by (110)

How this entity was disambiguated

How these facts were elicited