Skinner v. Oklahoma
E362099
Skinner v. Oklahoma is a landmark 1942 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a state law mandating the sterilization of certain criminal offenders, recognizing procreation as a fundamental right under the Equal Protection Clause.
All labels observed (4)
Statements (48)
| Predicate | Object |
|---|---|
| instanceOf |
United States Supreme Court case
ⓘ
landmark decision ⓘ |
| areaOfImpact |
compulsory sterilization jurisprudence
ⓘ
eugenics laws in the United States ⓘ reproductive autonomy ⓘ |
| category |
United States Supreme Court cases of the Stone Court
ⓘ
United States equal protection case law ⓘ United States reproductive rights case law ⓘ |
| chiefJusticeAtDecision |
Justice Harlan F. Stone
ⓘ
surface form:
Harlan F. Stone
|
| citation | 316 U.S. 535 ⓘ |
| constitutionalProvisionInterpreted |
Equal Protection Clause
ⓘ
surface form:
Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
|
| countryOfOrigin |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| court | Supreme Court of the United States ⓘ |
| decisionDate | 1942-06-01 ⓘ |
| decisionType | unanimous decision ⓘ |
| distinguishedFrom |
Buck v. Bell opinion
ⓘ
surface form:
Buck v. Bell
|
| fullName |
Skinner v. Oklahoma
self-linksurface differs
ⓘ
surface form:
Skinner v. Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson
|
| historicalContext | decided during the era of American eugenics laws ⓘ |
| holding |
Skinner v. Oklahoma
self-linksurface differs
ⓘ
surface form:
Oklahoma's Habitual Criminal Sterilization Act violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
Procreation is a fundamental right subject to strict scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause ⓘ |
| issue | constitutionality of compulsory sterilization of certain criminal offenders ⓘ |
| jurisdiction |
United States of America
ⓘ
surface form:
United States
|
| languageOfRecord | English ⓘ |
| lawChallenged |
Skinner v. Oklahoma
self-linksurface differs
ⓘ
surface form:
Oklahoma Habitual Criminal Sterilization Act
|
| legalPrinciple |
classification of crimes for sterilization must meet equal protection requirements
ⓘ
laws that infringe on fundamental rights are subject to strict scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause ⓘ procreation is one of the basic civil rights of man ⓘ |
| legalSubject |
constitutional law
ⓘ
criminal law ⓘ equal protection ⓘ reproductive rights ⓘ |
| opinionOfTheCourtBy |
William O. Douglas
ⓘ
surface form:
Justice William O. Douglas
|
| pageInUnitedStatesReports | 535 ⓘ |
| petitioner | Jack T. Skinner ⓘ |
| precedentFor |
cases recognizing procreation as a fundamental right
ⓘ
later equal protection cases involving fundamental rights ⓘ |
| recognizedRight |
bodily integrity in the context of sterilization
ⓘ
right to procreate ⓘ |
| relatedDoctrine |
fundamental rights
ⓘ
strict scrutiny ⓘ substantive due process ⓘ |
| remedy | state was barred from enforcing the sterilization statute against the petitioner ⓘ |
| respondent | State of Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson ⓘ |
| result | Oklahoma sterilization order against Jack Skinner was invalidated ⓘ |
| stateLawAtIssue | Oklahoma ⓘ |
| volumeInUnitedStatesReports | 316 ⓘ |
| vote | 9-0 ⓘ |
| yearDecided | 1942 ⓘ |
Referenced by (5)
Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.
this entity surface form:
Skinner v. Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson
this entity surface form:
Oklahoma's Habitual Criminal Sterilization Act violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
this entity surface form:
Oklahoma Habitual Criminal Sterilization Act