Skinner v. Oklahoma

E362099

Skinner v. Oklahoma is a landmark 1942 U.S. Supreme Court decision that struck down a state law mandating the sterilization of certain criminal offenders, recognizing procreation as a fundamental right under the Equal Protection Clause.

Try in SPARQL Jump to: Surface forms Statements Referenced by

All labels observed (4)

Statements (48)

Predicate Object
instanceOf United States Supreme Court case
landmark decision
areaOfImpact compulsory sterilization jurisprudence
eugenics laws in the United States
reproductive autonomy
category United States Supreme Court cases of the Stone Court
United States equal protection case law
United States reproductive rights case law
chiefJusticeAtDecision Justice Harlan F. Stone
surface form: Harlan F. Stone
citation 316 U.S. 535
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Equal Protection Clause
surface form: Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
countryOfOrigin United States of America
surface form: United States
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1942-06-01
decisionType unanimous decision
distinguishedFrom Buck v. Bell opinion
surface form: Buck v. Bell
fullName Skinner v. Oklahoma self-linksurface differs
surface form: Skinner v. Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson
historicalContext decided during the era of American eugenics laws
holding Skinner v. Oklahoma self-linksurface differs
surface form: Oklahoma's Habitual Criminal Sterilization Act violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

Procreation is a fundamental right subject to strict scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause
issue constitutionality of compulsory sterilization of certain criminal offenders
jurisdiction United States of America
surface form: United States
languageOfRecord English
lawChallenged Skinner v. Oklahoma self-linksurface differs
surface form: Oklahoma Habitual Criminal Sterilization Act
legalPrinciple classification of crimes for sterilization must meet equal protection requirements
laws that infringe on fundamental rights are subject to strict scrutiny under the Equal Protection Clause
procreation is one of the basic civil rights of man
legalSubject constitutional law
criminal law
equal protection
reproductive rights
opinionOfTheCourtBy William O. Douglas
surface form: Justice William O. Douglas
pageInUnitedStatesReports 535
petitioner Jack T. Skinner
precedentFor cases recognizing procreation as a fundamental right
later equal protection cases involving fundamental rights
recognizedRight bodily integrity in the context of sterilization
right to procreate
relatedDoctrine fundamental rights
strict scrutiny
substantive due process
remedy state was barred from enforcing the sterilization statute against the petitioner
respondent State of Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson
result Oklahoma sterilization order against Jack Skinner was invalidated
stateLawAtIssue Oklahoma
volumeInUnitedStatesReports 316
vote 9-0
yearDecided 1942

Referenced by (5)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Buck v. Bell opinion citedBy Skinner v. Oklahoma
Skinner v. Oklahoma fullName Skinner v. Oklahoma self-linksurface differs
this entity surface form: Skinner v. Oklahoma ex rel. Williamson
Skinner v. Oklahoma holding Skinner v. Oklahoma self-linksurface differs
this entity surface form: Oklahoma's Habitual Criminal Sterilization Act violated the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
Skinner v. Oklahoma lawChallenged Skinner v. Oklahoma self-linksurface differs
this entity surface form: Oklahoma Habitual Criminal Sterilization Act