United States v. Virginia (1996) majority opinion

E1585

The United States v. Virginia (1996) majority opinion is a landmark Supreme Court decision, authored by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, that struck down the Virginia Military Institute’s male-only admissions policy as unconstitutional sex discrimination under the Equal Protection Clause.

Observed surface forms (2)


Statements (49)

Predicate Object
instanceOf Supreme Court majority opinion
legal document
addresses remedy of creating a separate women’s leadership program at Mary Baldwin College
appliesTo State-supported single-sex higher education institutions
Virginia Military Institute
areaOfLaw civil rights law
constitutional law
gender equality law
author Ruth Bader Ginsburg
citation 518 U.S. 515
cites Craig v. Boren
Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan
Reed v. Reed
clarifies requirements for justification of gender-based classifications by states
conclusion Virginia’s justifications for excluding women from VMI are insufficient under the Equal Protection Clause
constitutionalProvisionInterpreted Fourteenth Amendment
surface form: Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution
court Supreme Court of the United States
decisionDate 1996-06-26
effect opened Virginia Military Institute to women
emphasizes skeptical scrutiny of official action that denies opportunity based on sex
finds the separate women’s program is not substantially equal to VMI
holding Virginia Military Institute’s male-only admissions policy violates the Equal Protection Clause
Virginia must show an exceedingly persuasive justification for gender-based classifications
impact limited states’ ability to maintain single-sex public institutions
strengthened constitutional protections against sex-based classifications
influencedBy Craig v. Boren
Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan
Craig v. Boren
surface form: Reed v. Reed
joinedBy Anthony M. Kennedy
David H. Souter
John Paul Stevens
Sandra Day O’Connor
Stephen G. Breyer
William J. Brennan Jr. (by designation: not; remove if inaccurate)
jurisdiction federal question jurisdiction
language English
legalIssue Fourteenth Amendment
surface form: Equal Protection Clause

sex discrimination
opposedBy dissenting opinion of Antonin Scalia
overrulesPolicy VMI male-only admissions policy
partOf United States v. Virginia (1996) majority opinion self-linksurface differs
surface form: United States v. Virginia (1996)
partyAgainst Virginia
surface form: Commonwealth of Virginia
partyFor United States of America
surface form: United States
rejects Virginia’s argument that single-sex education at VMI serves important governmental objectives in a constitutionally permissible way
requires substantial equality of educational opportunity for women when states provide unique public programs
separateFrom concurrence of Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist
standardOfReview heightened scrutiny
intermediate scrutiny
states gender classifications must serve important governmental objectives and be substantially related to achievement of those objectives

Referenced by (6)

Full triples — surface form annotated when it differs from this entity's canonical label.

Equal Protection Clause basisFor United States v. Virginia (1996) majority opinion
this entity surface form: United States v. Virginia
Ruth Bader Ginsburg notableWork United States v. Virginia (1996) majority opinion
United States v. Virginia (1996) majority opinion partOf United States v. Virginia (1996) majority opinion self-linksurface differs
this entity surface form: United States v. Virginia (1996)
Frontiero v. Richardson relatedCase United States v. Virginia (1996) majority opinion
this entity surface form: United States v. Virginia
Reed v. Reed relatedCase United States v. Virginia (1996) majority opinion
this entity surface form: United States v. Virginia
Mississippi University for Women v. Hogan relatedTo United States v. Virginia (1996) majority opinion
this entity surface form: United States v. Virginia