legalPrecedentInvolved

P72403
predicate

Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.

Try in SPARQL

All labels observed (9)

Label Occurrences
includesCaseLaw 8
relatedToPrecedent 3
appliedInCaseLaw 2

Description generation (PDg)

The one-sentence description above was generated by prompting gpt-5.1 with the predicate name and this instruction.

Instruction
Given a predicate that represents a relationship or action between entities, generate a one-sentence description explaining its meaning.  
# Instructions
Focus on describing the relationship, not the entities themselves. 
# Response Format
Begin the description with \' Indicates...\'
Input
Predicate: legalPrecedentInvolved
Generated description
Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.

Sample triples (20)

Subject Object
Paula Corbin Jones presidential immunity in civil suits ⓘ
European Communities Act 1972 R v Secretary of State for Transport, ex parte Factortame Ltd via predicate surface "appliedInCaseLaw" ⓘ
European Communities Act 1972 R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union via predicate surface "appliedInCaseLaw" ⓘ
Michael Baca states may enforce elector pledges through removal or sanction via predicate surface "legalPrecedentResultingFromCase" ⓘ
Carey v. Population Services International Griswold v. Connecticut via predicate surface "relatedToPrecedent" ⓘ
Carey v. Population Services International Eisenstadt v. Baird via predicate surface "relatedToPrecedent" ⓘ
Carey v. Population Services International Roe v. Wade via predicate surface "relatedToPrecedent" ⓘ
Tennessee v. Lane City of Boerne v. Flores via predicate surface "followsCaseLawFrom" ⓘ
Tennessee v. Lane Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett via predicate surface "followsCaseLawFrom" ⓘ
Kivalina v. ExxonMobil American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut via predicate surface "courtReliedOn" NERFINISHED ⓘ
United States disability rights law Olmstead v. L.C. via predicate surface "includesCaseLaw" NERFINISHED ⓘ
United States disability rights law Tennessee v. Lane via predicate surface "includesCaseLaw" NERFINISHED ⓘ
United States disability rights law Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. Garrett via predicate surface "includesCaseLaw" NERFINISHED ⓘ
United States disability rights law Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc. via predicate surface "includesCaseLaw" NERFINISHED ⓘ
United States disability rights law Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. Williams via predicate surface "includesCaseLaw" NERFINISHED ⓘ
United States disability rights law US Airways, Inc. v. Barnett via predicate surface "includesCaseLaw" NERFINISHED ⓘ
United States disability rights law Alexander v. Choate via predicate surface "includesCaseLaw" NERFINISHED ⓘ
United States disability rights law Pennsylvania Department of Corrections v. Yeskey via predicate surface "includesCaseLaw" NERFINISHED ⓘ
Michael Crawford testimonial statements require prior opportunity for cross-examination to be admitted via predicate surface "precedentEstablishedInCase" ⓘ
Evan Miller requirement for individualized sentencing for juveniles facing life without parole via predicate surface "legalCaseLedTo" ⓘ