Triple
T32152373
| Position | Surface form | Disambiguated ID | Type / Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Subject | Michael Crawford |
E821192
|
entity |
| Predicate | precedentEstablishedInCase |
P72403
|
FINISHED |
| Object | testimonial statements require prior opportunity for cross-examination to be admitted |
—
|
LITERAL FINISHED |
How this triple was built (2 steps)
Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.
NER
Named-entity recognition
gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: testimonial statements require prior opportunity for cross-examination to be admitted | Statement: [Michael Crawford, precedentEstablishedInCase, testimonial statements require prior opportunity for cross-examination to be admitted]
PD
Predicate disambiguation
gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07
Target predicate: precedentEstablishedInCase Context triple: [Michael Crawford, precedentEstablishedInCase, testimonial statements require prior opportunity for cross-examination to be admitted]
-
A.
legalPrecedentFrom
Indicates that a legal decision, ruling, or principle is derived from, based on, or justified by an earlier legal case or authority.
-
B.
subsequentCitationAsPrecedentFor
Indicates that one citation is used later as a precedent or authoritative basis for another citation or legal decision.
-
C.
hasCourtPrecedence
Indicates that one court decision or ruling holds authoritative priority over another in legal reasoning or application.
-
D.
precedentInterpreted
Indicates that one legal precedent is interpreted or understood in a particular way, often as clarified or applied in subsequent decisions or analyses.
-
E.
legalPrecedentInvolved
chosen
Indicates that a particular legal precedent (prior court decision or ruling) is relevant to, cited in, or forms the basis for the current legal matter or action.
- F. None of above.
Provenance (3 batches)
The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.
| Step | Stage | Batch ID | Status | When |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| creating | Elicitation | batch_69f3490520d081909b2f1271dab75faa |
completed | April 30, 2026, 12:20 p.m. |
| NER | Named-entity recognition | batch_69fbaebc8f2c8190b94f1b4a3ec92e8c |
completed | May 6, 2026, 9:12 p.m. |
| PD | Predicate disambiguation | batch_69fbadf1e6008190a71bbd196ba06844 |
completed | May 6, 2026, 9:09 p.m. |
Created at: May 1, 2026, 12:31 a.m.