Triple

T16292748
Position Surface form Disambiguated ID Type / Status
Subject Carey v. Population Services International E395565 entity
Predicate relatedToPrecedent P72403 FINISHED
Object Eisenstadt v. Baird E126159 NE FINISHED

How this triple was built (2 steps)

Every LLM step that produced this triple, in pipeline order — named-entity classification, the disambiguation choices (the exact options shown, with the pick highlighted), and the generated description. The batch + timestamp of each is in the Provenance table below.

NER Named-entity recognition gpt-5-mini
Instruction
Given a phrase, classify it is english named entity (e.g., persons, organizations, works of art) in Latin script, or not (e.g., literals, dates, URLs, verbose phrases). For disambiguation, the statement where the phrase occurs as object is also given. Please return a JSON object with `phrase` (string, the phrase being analyzed) and `is_ne` (boolean, indicating whether the phrase is a Named Entity).
Input
Phrase: Eisenstadt v. Baird | Statement: [Carey v. Population Services International, relatedToPrecedent, Eisenstadt v. Baird]
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) gpt-5-mini-2025-08-07 
Target entity: Eisenstadt v. Baird
Context triple: [Carey v. Population Services International, relatedToPrecedent, Eisenstadt v. Baird]
  • A. Eisenstadt v. Baird chosen
    Eisenstadt v. Baird is a landmark 1972 U.S. Supreme Court decision that extended the right to possess and use contraceptives to unmarried individuals, significantly advancing privacy and equal protection jurisprudence.
  • B. Regan v. Wald
    Regan v. Wald is a 1984 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld federal restrictions on travel to Cuba, affirming broad executive authority over foreign affairs and economic sanctions.
  • C. Jacobellis v. Ohio
    Jacobellis v. Ohio is a 1964 U.S. Supreme Court decision that refined the constitutional standards for obscenity under the First Amendment, famously associated with Justice Potter Stewart’s “I know it when I see it” concurrence.
  • D. Van Orden v. Perry
    Van Orden v. Perry is a 2005 U.S. Supreme Court case that upheld the constitutionality of a Ten Commandments monument on Texas State Capitol grounds against an Establishment Clause challenge.
  • E. Alden v. Maine
    Alden v. Maine is a 1999 U.S. Supreme Court decision that expanded state sovereign immunity by holding that states are generally immune from private suits for damages in their own courts under federal law.
  • F. None of above.
  • G. Unsure - the case is ambiguous/there is not enough information to decide.

Provenance (3 batches)

The batch behind each pipeline step, in order, with when it ran. Timestamps are batch-level — stages were processed in waves, so the object chain (NER → NED1 → NEDg → NED2) reads in order, but predicate / elicitation batches can sit in a different wave.

Step Stage Batch ID Status When
creating Elicitation batch_69d87f22c7248190a54c949738441e2e completed April 10, 2026, 4:40 a.m.
NER Named-entity recognition batch_69e25e2aee6881909fd28547f135427c completed April 17, 2026, 4:22 p.m.
NED1 Entity disambiguation (via context triple) batch_6a001f97895081909f22ded3507afe14 completed May 10, 2026, 6:03 a.m.
Created at: April 10, 2026, 5:05 a.m.